My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007692
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
1250
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507153
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007692
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2020 10:41:12 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 10:21:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007692
RECORD_ID
PR0507153
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007717
FACILITY_NAME
THRIFTY OIL #171
STREET_NUMBER
1250
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
11731001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1250 N WILSON WAY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GeoHydrologic Consultants, Inc <br /> The results are summarized in Table 2A with historic groundwater sample results and the <br />' sample results from the first quarter 2005 The results for the additional oxygenate data <br /> are summarized in Table 213 The laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation <br /> for these samples are included in Appendices E and F The distribution of the TPHg, <br /> benzene, and MTBE concentrations in groundwater is depicted in Figure 5A, 5B, and <br /> 5C, respectively <br /> 4.6 Well Development <br /> West Hazmat Drilling was contracted to develop eight existing on-site wells and the two <br />' newly installed wells (EW-5D and EW-5S) Development of the ten on-site wells was <br /> conducted on February 23 and 24, 2005 A stainless steel bailer was used to purge <br /> groundwater and remove silt from the wells which was operated by a cable winch using a <br />' truck-mounted development rig Depth to water and depth to bottom (both prior to and <br /> post development) were gauged and the purge water was stored on-site in DOT approved <br /> 55-gallon containers Wells EW-5D and EW-5S were developed by surging and bailing <br /> on Thursday February 24, 2005 Information concerning the well development is <br /> included in Table 3 <br />' 5.0 MULTI-PHASE EXTRACTION PILOT TESTS <br /> lie To determine the effectiveness of multi-phase extraction (combined vapor/groundwater <br /> extraction) and the proper spacing of wells for multi-phase extraction activities if this <br /> technology is selected as the remedial solution for the Site, a two-day pilot study was <br /> conducted on March 17 and 24, 2005 The tests consisted of two 8-hour multi-phase <br /> (vapor/groundwater) extraction pilot tests performed on extraction wells EW-5D and <br /> EW-5S on March 17 and March 24, respectively The results are summarized in the <br /> following subsections <br /> The MPE tests were conducted using a mobile vapor extraction test rig, supplied by TRC <br />' Alton Geoscience (TRC) of Irvine, California and a two-inch diameter variable speed <br /> Grunfos electrical submersible pump for extraction of liquids Liquids were discharged <br /> through a new garden house to a 4,000-gallon Baker Tank which was stored onsite <br />' pending analytical results and for proper disposal of purged groundwater <br /> The vapor extraction test rig had a flow rate capability of 313 actual cubic feet per minute <br />' (acfm at 60° F and 14 7 psi ) and total vacuum capable of 394 inches of water or up to 29 <br /> inches of mercury (in Hg) The test rig was equipped with a liquid knockout pot having <br /> an automatic transfer pump, manual and automatic dilution air control, a high-vacuum <br /> blower(powered by a separate mobile generator), and a propane fired thermal oxidizer <br /> for destruction of extracted vapors The tests were performed at maximum flow rates to <br /> arrive at a better understanding of airflow characteristics, radius of influence (ROI), <br />' effect of the vacuum on the water table, and changes in concentration at each well <br /> • <br />' roc 171 Not study Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.