Laserfiche WebLink
GeoHydrologic Consultants, Inc <br /> prior to starting the test A maximum drawdown was observed all the way down to the <br /> pump intake at 58 40 feet deep approximately one hour into the test and remained at that <br /> level for the remaining six hours of the test At one to two hours into the 8-hour test, <br /> drawdown was measured in extraction well EW-5S and the water had been drawn down <br /> ' to the pump intake and was not recharging quick enough to produce water at the surface <br /> At 1 25 hours into the test, dilution air was added to the system (manifold valve opened <br /> 100%) and the control panel was increased to 200 hertz which again produced water from <br /> ' the pump discharge at a sustained flow rate of between 0 5 and 0 25 gallons per minute <br /> A total of 180 gallons was extracted during the 8-hour test at an average flow rate of <br /> 0 375 gallons per minute Measurable drawdown was observed in observation wells MW- <br /> ' 5 (maximum drawdown 0 04 feet), TB-9 (maximum drawdown 0 26 feet), TB-11 <br /> (maximum drawdown 0 82 feet), TB-10 (maximum drawdown 0 04 feet), MW-4 <br /> (maximum drawdown 0 03), and TB-7 (maximum drawdown 0 06 feet) <br />' Vapor samples were collected during the multi-phase extraction test (032405ST, <br /> 032405M, and 03240505FN) from the total undiluted inlet along with groundwater <br /> samples from the pump discharge (032405ST and 032405END) Vapor samples were <br /> analyzed by Associated Laboratories of Orange, California for TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE <br /> using EPA Methods 8015 Modified and TO-15, along with oxygenates (DIPE, ETBE, <br />' TAME, and TBA) and fixed gases (oxygen, carbon dioxide, and methane) Groundwater <br /> samples were analyzed for TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE using EPA Methods 8015 Modified <br /> and 8260B including other oxygenates (DIPE, ETBE, TAME, and TBA) The laboratory <br />' analytical results are summarized in Table 6 (vapor) and Table 7 (groundwater) <br /> A total of three vapor samples (six tedlar bags) were taken for laboratory analysis from <br /> Y <br /> well EW-5S on March 24, 2005 The concentrations of TPHg were detected at 434 ppmV <br /> from sample EW-5S-032405ST, 2,880 ppmV from sample EW-5S-032405M, and 3,590 <br /> ppmV from sample EW-5S-032405FN The concentrations of benzene were detected at <br /> 1 26 ppmV from sample EW-5S-032405ST, 18 7 ppmV from sample EW-5D-032405M, <br /> and 29 1 ppmV from sample EW-5S-032405FN The concentrations of MTBE were <br /> detected at 0 334 ppmV from the sample EW-5S-032405ST, 0 845 ppmV from the <br /> sample EW-5S-032405M, and 2 14 from the sample EW-5S-032405FN The three <br /> samples were analyzed for the fixed gases oxygen, carbon dioxide, and methane Sample <br /> EW-5S-032405ST was found to have 10 48% oxygen, sample EW-5S-032405M was <br />' found to have 12 11%oxygen, and sample EW-5S-032405FN had a detection of 12 95% <br /> oxygen Methane for the three tested samples was below the method detection limits <br /> (0 2%) Carbon dioxide was detected in samples EW-5S-032405ST, EW-5S-032405M, <br />' and EW-5S-032405FN at concentrations of 11 44%, 14 66%, and 13 40%, respectively <br /> The results are summarized in Table 6 The vapor concentrations appeared to increase <br /> significantly in the total influent from the start of the combined test performed on EW-5S <br />' (434 ppmV TPHg) throughout the entire duration of the combined test (2,880 ppmV <br /> TPHg (M), and 3,590 ppmV TPHg(FN)) EW-5S inlet concentrations as measured in the <br /> field with a calibrated PID fluctuated throughout the duration of the test, however the <br />' final concentration (320 ppm) was greater than the initial concentration (260 ppm) taken <br /> at the start of the test <br /> • <br /> f <br /> ITOC 171 rdat study Page 13 <br />