Laserfiche WebLink
The screens in wells TB-7 and TB-8 end with the bottom 5 feet of screen in sand Yet, 7 <br /> the wells do not dewater because there is a single water table Historically (Thrifty <br /> 1993), depth to groundwater was measured at 75 feet bgs orjust below the sand layer <br /> indicating the water table is under unconfined conditions, for if confined conditions <br />' existed, the water table would have risen above the saturated sand interval <br /> mil <br /> • The contaminant plume with no degradation arrives at the receptor (nearest groundwater }L�`toe' <br /> II�-( <br />' production well, 1,500 feet downgradient) at approximately year 156 Based on a ' 1 lb4fa� <br /> BIOSCREEN simulation model, the MTBE plume would impact the receptor well at <br /> years 156 through 264 with no degradation and would never impact the well with the 1st <br /> Order Decay model <br /> • The greatest mass of fuel released was in the vicinity of the former USTs and associated <br />' piping prior to 1994, when the USTs were removed Based on early groundwater <br /> monitoring and sampling, free product was first detected in groundwater monitoring well <br /> MW-5 in June 1993, but rapidly dissipated from hand bailing and from May 1994 on, no <br /> free product has been detected <br /> • The vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil does not appear to extend below 80 feet <br />' bgs with the exception of low concentrations (<10 mg/Kg) of TPHg and(<0 006 mg/Kg) <br /> benzene in borings CPT-3 and CPT-4 at 90 to 100 feet bgs No hydrocarbon constituents <br /> were detected below 100 feet bgs This suggests that the fine grained interval from <br /> approximately 75 to 90 feet bgs retarded the vertical migration of hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soil Low concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes are also present below 80 <br /> feet bgs Since the CPT borings were completed in the areas of greatest hydrocarbon <br />' impact, it appears that the vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil is delineated <br />' • Hydrocarbon-impacted soil is present in three main areas beneath the site including just <br /> north of the former USTs (area 1, MW-5, CPT-4, etc ), the former USTs (area 2, MW-2, <br /> CPT-2, etc ), and just north of the middle dispenser island (area 3, TDD-14, TDD-15, <br />' TB-3) as shown on Figures 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, and 5F TPHg-impacted soil (>10 <br /> mg/Kg) is present to a depth of 80 feet bgs in areas 1 and 2 and 30 feet bgs in area 3 <br /> Based on average TPHg concentrations in area 1 (971 mg/Kg), area 2 (987 mg/Kg) and <br /> area 3 (8,333 mg/Kg) it is estimated that the mass of hydrocarbon in soil was <br /> approximately 112,824 pounds This is only a rough estimate based on several <br /> reasonable assumptions, the actual hydrocarbon load in the soils could dramatically differ <br />' from this estimate To date, the SVE system has removed a calculated 140,299 pounds of <br /> hydrocarbons Part of the reason for the discrepancy that more hydrocarbons have been <br /> removed than were estimated to be present is the hydrocarbon-impacted area may be <br />' larger onsite Several borings simply were not extended and sampled below 60 feet bgs <br /> such as all of the TDD borings drilled by Pacific and several of the TB borings (Figures <br /> 5D, 5E, and 5F) <br />' • Based on the assessment completed by AGE (2004), the lateral extent of hydrocarbon- <br /> impacted soil appears to be defined to the west and south by the presence of bonngs <br /> 12 <br />