Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Hydro&eo Consultants <br />' 5.4 Groundwater Results <br />' The analytical results for the groundwater samples collected at two hours (13 30, <br /> 3116/02), six hours (17 30, 3/16/02), 12 hours (23 30, 3/16/02), 18 hours (5 30, 3/17/02), <br /> and 24 hours (11 15, 3/17/02) during the pumping test from MW-5 are summarized in <br />' Table 7 Laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation are included in <br /> Appendix B <br />' The sample results indicated that elevated levels of TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE were <br /> detected Concentration for TPHg ranged from 42 1 mg/L at the beginning of the test to <br />' 54 2 mg/L at the end of the test, with a general increasing trend throughout the test A <br /> similar increasing trend was observed for toluene (4 23 mg/L — 6 14 mg/L) Benzene on <br /> the other hand had a decreasing trend during the test with the highest concentrations <br />' being detected at the beginning of the test (3 12 mg/L) and the lowest concentration being <br /> detected at the end of the test(1 62 mg/L) Ethylbenze concentrations ranged from 1 99 <br /> mg/L at the beginning of the test to 2 23 mg/L at 12 hours Xylene concentrations were <br /> lowest at the beginning of the test (8 05 mg/L) and maximum concentrations were <br /> detected at 18 hours (12 4 mg/L) MTBE concentrations also indicated a slight decreasing <br /> trend during the test with maximum concentrations being detected in the first sample <br />' collected at 2 hours (2 0 mg/L) and the lowest concentration being detected at hour 24 <br /> (1 34 mg/L) <br /> 6.0 AQUIFER TEST CONCLUSIONS <br />' The differences between the aquifer properties calculated from the pumping well <br /> drawdown and recovery and the observation well drawdown results is most likely the <br /> result of the following conditions <br /> • The pumping well MW-5 is completed In mostly fine grained sediments with a higher <br /> permeability zone of sand to silty sand from 65 to 70 feet below grade, thus the <br />' delayed well response measured in the observation wells, followed by a recovery <br /> period, was most likely the result of this heterogeneity in sediments and resulting <br /> differences in yields from the various zones, including potential vertical movement of <br />' water <br /> • The observation wells are completed in different zones than the pumping well MW-5, <br />' some do not penetrate the sandy layer at 65-70 feet, and many of these wells only <br /> partially penetrate the aquifer Thus the data obtained from the observation wells is <br /> less reliable than the data obtained from the pump well <br /> • This conclusion is further supported by the non linear drawdown measured in each of <br /> the observation wells (Figures 7, 8, and 9) and by the non linear relationship of <br />' maximum drawdown observed with respect to distance away from the pumping well <br /> (Figure 10) <br /> 1 <br />' Thrifty Oil TQC 9171 Aquifer Test and RAP Rpt Page I I <br />