Laserfiche WebLink
• i. <br /> CLOSURE DOCUMENT ADPL.—ATION SITES ►�nr� i\) 1���� until 1�11�1A�1 s ���,� <br /> L <br /> 1. � Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and other uses within <br /> 2000 feet of the site; <br /> 2. U v--, Sips, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former and existing tank systems, <br /> excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation contours, <br /> gradients, and nearby surface waters, build=ings, streets, and subsurface utiMs; <br /> 3. LC Figures depicting lithology (cross section), treatment system diagrams; <br /> 4. `�' Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal (quantity); ;r"'�Q'�`ti� d�� 4- n • �i o <br /> f�0` nr�rtvwt orLral.5L .0 M. <br /> S. f`�" Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; : . <br /> 6. LLr--S Tabulated data of all ground water elevations and depths to water, = 5y.b"j a <br /> 7. k_At,,o Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: <br /> Detection limits for confirmation sampling <br /> v Lead analyses <br /> 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil and ground water, both <br /> on- and off-site: <br /> i <br /> Lateral extent of soil contamination z s ' <br /> Vertical extent of soil contamination <br /> �- Lateral extent of ground water contamination <br /> Vertical extent of ground watef contamination <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for the subsurface remediation system and the i <br /> zone of capture attained for the soil and ground water remediation system; <br /> 10. ✓ Reports/information <br /> Unauthorized Release Form (URF) <br /> �QMRs (Dates) -j of �'q3 � 9/93 . 1 '94 <br /> o PAR <br /> �J o_FRP <br /> Other (report name) kerry&d 60 hint st0/9 I ; 4,VX:7- <br /> Well and boring logs <br /> 11. Best Available Technology (BAT) used or an explanation for not using BAT; <br /> 12. dr,� Reasons why "background" was/is unattainable using BAT; <br /> 13. Mass balance calculation of the substance treated versus that remaining;'°° IU <br /> , <br /> LI.Pq <br /> 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in risk assessments, and fate and transport <br /> modeling; <br /> 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at the site will not adversely impact water quality, health, or <br /> other beneficial uses; and <br /> 16. WET or TCLP results <br /> Comments: } <br /> By: t✓a-��-c i <br /> Date: 11 30 5S7_ `✓ J <br />