Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 'T'hu'd Quarter 1993 Mon,tormg Report <br /> Coca-Cola Enterpnses, Inc <br />' Project No 54006 02 <br /> Page 2 <br />' petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil were present from 0 to approximately 25 feet below grade <br /> and within a radius of about 20 feet of the former 1,000 gallon gasoline UST tank pit. A soil <br /> vapor extraction system was constructed at the site and began operating July 23, 1993. <br /> Quarterly groundwater monitoring results have shown detectable levels of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in the monitoring wells in the past (Table 1). <br /> GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND GRADIENT EVALUATION <br />' RESNA personnel performed the latest quarterly groundwater monitoring of monitoring wells <br /> on September 2, 1993. Mr. Michael Collins of SJCPHS was present on-site to observe RESNA <br /> sampling techniques Field work consisted of measuring depth-to-water (DTW) levels in wells <br />' MW-1 through MW-6, collecting groundwater samples from wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-6, <br /> and submitting groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. <br />' Water level measurements were collected from wells MW-1 through MW-6. The depth to water <br /> ranged from 71.00 to 71.61 feet below top of well casing elevation. In general, groundwater <br /> elevations have decreased an average of 2.07 feet since June 3, 1993. The water level data were <br /> used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Plate 3) Assuming that horizontal <br /> isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site flowed in an <br /> east-northeast direction The hydraulic gradient on September 2, 1993 was calculated to be <br />' 0 0013 ft/ft or about 7 feet/mile. These data indicate no change when compared with the <br /> previous quarterly monitoring results for gradient flow and direction. A summary of <br /> groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 2. Groundwater elevations are referenced <br />' to feet mean sea level. <br />' Groundwater samples were collected from three shallow groundwater monitoring wells, MW-1, <br /> MW-2, and MW-6. Prior to collection of groundwater samples a minimum of three well casing <br /> volumes were purged The depth-to-water, pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were <br /> measured and allowed to stabilize before groundwater samples were collected. No evidence of <br /> measurable floating product or hydrocarbon vapor was noted in the water samples Samples <br /> were then collected from each well using disposable bailers. Purge water was contained in 55 <br /> 1 gallon DOT approved drums and stored on-site. <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted with Chain of Custody <br /> Record to Sequoia Analytical Laboratones of Redwood City, California, a State Certified <br /> laboratory (State Hazardous Waste Testing Laboratory Certification No 1210). Samples were <br /> analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (IPHG), total petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> as diesel (TPHD), and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) utilizing EPA <br /> methods 5030/8015/8020 <br /> 1 Groundwater well purge and sample logs are provided in Appendix A <br />' 3QMR1993 FNL, <br />