Laserfiche WebLink
Data Usability Summary <br /> initial data. Therefore,the initial results were reported both analytes were flagged `E'. Samples MW-6- <br /> W-080409MS and MW-6-W-080409MSD were not flagged because their MS/MSD recoveries were <br /> within acceptance criteria. <br /> The continuing calibration verification standard analyzed with samples MW-2-W-080717,MW-3-W- <br /> 080717,MW-5-W-080717 MW-5-WD-080717MS and MW-5-WD-080717MSD was outside the method <br /> limits. Samples MW-3-W-080717 and MW-5-WD-080717MS did not have any remaining samples for <br /> reanalysis so the initial results were reported and flagged `E'. The remaining samples were re-injected for <br /> second analysis however the surrogate recoveries were above the QC criteria with comparable results so <br /> the initial results were reported. All results for this data set were flagged V. <br /> Surrogates <br /> All surrogates were within QC range with the following exceptions: Surrogate Orthoterphenyl percent <br /> recovery was above the acceptance criteria for the LCS and MS/MSD pair MW-6-W-080409MS/MW-6- <br /> W-080409MSD however associated samples were within acceptance criteria therefore no flags were <br /> Lapplied for this discrepancy. <br /> Representativeness <br /> Representativeness was assessed through the evaluation of the equipment blank sample, chain-of-custody <br /> forms,preservation, and holding times. The reported results were also compared to the laboratory's <br /> MDLs and LOQs. <br /> ' Method Blank Results <br /> All laboratory method blanks were free of contamination. <br /> ' Field QC Results <br /> Two rinsate blank were submitted with the field samples. The rinsate blanks were free of contamination <br /> with the following exceptions: Naphthalene was detected in rinsate blank QA-Pump-R-080409 at 0.032 <br /> ug/l the associated samples MW-6-W-080409 and MW-7-W-080409 results for Naphthalene were <br /> flagged `E'. One set of field duplicates were taken during events. TPH-DRO and TPH-DRO w/SiGel <br /> field duplicates MW-7-W-080717 and MW-7-WD-080717 were outside the relative percent difference <br /> ' 30%for water samples. The results were flagged `E'. <br /> Chain-Of-Custody Forms <br /> 1 Sample analytical results were evaluated for agreement with the chain-of-custody form. Based on the <br /> evaluation, all samples were received at the lab in the appropriate containers and in good condition with <br /> the chain-of-custody form filled out properly. <br /> Preservation and Holding Times <br /> Samples were preserved in the field as appropriate, were received at the laboratory within the acceptance <br /> ' temperature criterion of 4±2°C, and sample preservations, when required by the analysis, were less than <br /> the acceptance pH limit of 2. The samples were prepared and analyzed within specified holding times. <br /> Reporting Limits <br /> Data reported for this sampling event were reported with the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs). <br /> The MDL represents the lowest concentration point where an analyte can be positively identified, but the <br /> quantitation is an estimate. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of an analyte in a <br /> sample that the laboratory can report with precision and accuracy. Analytes that were reported between <br /> the MDL and LOQ for this data set were qualified "J" as estimates. Due to the nature of the sample <br /> matrix, the laboratory used reduced aliquots for several samples and the MDL and LOQ were adjusted <br /> appropriately. <br />