Laserfiche WebLink
Duncan Austin, Site File • - 3 - • 11/3/2005 <br /> Former Morton Paint Manufacturing Site <br /> Stockton, San Joaquin County <br /> 6. Section 1.2 of the Investigation Work Plan is titled Alco OU Settlement Provisions. The section <br /> contains a number of statements concerning a settlement between the Redevelopment Agency and <br /> other Potentially Responsible Parties. This information is not pertinent to the investigation work <br /> plan. <br /> However, there is language in this section of the Work Plan that does not reflect the entire process . <br /> for site cleanup. Site cleanup goes beyond cleaning up the soils to health based residential standards <br /> as contemplated in that section. Site cleanup must,in addition to cleaning up groundwater, cleanup <br /> soils to protect against fixture groundwater pollution. Please see the 2 November 2000 Regional <br /> Board memo entitled"Establishing Numerical Water Quality Limits for Cleanup of Groundwater <br /> which provides the procedure for establishing numerical water quality limits as groundwater cleanup <br /> goals. See also the 19 September 2000 Regional Board memo entitled"Beneficial Use Protective <br /> Water Quality Limits for Components of Petroleum Based Fuels"and the 21 November 2000 <br /> Regional Board memo entitled"Petroleum Contaminated Soil "Inert" Classification that provides <br /> guidelines for establishing remediation goals for site cleanups. <br /> Also, the Redevelopment Agency is responsible for cleaning up offsite groundwater pollution that <br /> has migrated from the Morton Plant Property and impairs or threatens to impair the designated <br /> beneficial uses of waters of the state, in a manner that is also protective of human health. <br /> Finally,this section states, "Discussions with the Regional Board have indicated issuance of a <br /> Bifurcated No Further Action(Bifurcated NFA)would meet these requirements, thereby confirming <br /> that cleanup has been achieved during this timeframe to allow site development and long term <br /> groundwater cleanup and monitoring, and any treatment system O&M to proceed." The Work Plan <br /> should clarify what requirements this sentence references. Regional Board staff could, in particular <br /> cases, allow development of a polluted site to proceed as long as the soils have been adequately <br /> remediated and so long as any construction will not impair the completion of any necessary <br /> groundwater cleanup action. <br /> 7. In implementing the required actions of the Polanco Redevelopment Act, the Redevelopment <br /> Agency is directed to request cleanup guidelines from the Regional Board and subsequently submit a <br /> remedial action plan or cleanup plan. For cleanup guidelines, Regional Board staff refers the <br /> Redevelopment Agency to Division 7 of the Water Code, the Regional Board's Water Quality <br /> Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins, and State and Regional Board <br /> resolutions, including State Board's Resolution No. 92-49 Policies and Procedures for Investigation <br /> and Cleanup and Abatement of Discharges Under Water Code Section 13304. Site-specific <br /> guidance will be provided in the manner that is standard practice for the Regional Board,which is by <br /> written comment on data and work plans submitted by the Redevelopment Agency for a particular <br /> site. This review protocol reflects the iterative nature of environmental cleanup, as investigation <br /> proceeds, more information is available on which to make decisions. Site-specific guidelines are <br /> necessary before the Redevelopment Agency may take action to remedy or remove pollution found at <br /> the site. Of some importance to guidelines with regard to remediation at a redevelopment site is land <br /> reuse. Thus, Regional Board staff encourages the Redevelopment Agency to move forward with an <br /> approved conceptual development for its property. <br />