Laserfiche WebLink
I effect that ambiguity is construed against the drafting party shall be inapplicable in any <br /> 2 dispute concerning the terms, meaning, or interpretation of this Consent Judgment. <br /> 3 22. COUNTERPART SIGNATURES <br /> 4 This Consent Judgment may be executed by the Parties in counterpart, and when a <br /> 5 copy is signed by an authorized representative of each Party, the Consent Judgment shall <br /> 6 be effective as if a single document were signed by all Parties. <br /> 7 23. INCORPORATION OF EXHIBITS <br /> 8 Exhibits "A" and `B" are incorporated herein by reference. <br /> 9 24. EFFECTIVE DATE <br /> 10 This Consent Judgment shall take effect immediately upon entry hereof. <br /> 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED: <br /> 12 FOR THE PLAINTIFF: <br /> 13 to <br /> Dated: 2005 <br /> 14 <br /> DEAN D. FLIPPO, District Attorney <br /> 15 Of the Co my of Monterey <br /> 16 <br /> 17 By: <br /> MATT BOGOSHI <br /> 18 Deputy District Attorney <br /> 19 <br /> JAMES P. WILLETT <br /> 20 District Attome , San Joaquin unty <br /> 21 <br /> 22 — <br /> By: <br /> DAVID J. IRE <br /> 23 Supervising Deputy District Attorney <br /> 24 <br /> STEVE COOLEY <br /> 25 District Attome of Los Angel County <br /> 26 , <br /> 27 y <br /> STANLEY P. LIAMS <br /> 28 Assistant Head Deputy District <br /> -13- Attorney <br /> 324/0 CONSENT AGREEMENT AND STIPULATION FOR <br /> 645783.01 a09/27/05 ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT <br />