My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2004-2007
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1469
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231126
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2004-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2024 1:03:59 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:44:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2004-2007
RECORD_ID
PR0231126
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001570
FACILITY_NAME
UNITED # 5447
STREET_NUMBER
1469
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95210
APN
08818030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1469 E HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231126_1469 E HAMMER_2004-2007.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
338
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Altoring System Certification <br />Site Address: 1469E HAMMER LANE Date of Testing/Service: 07/21/2006 <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />X Yes <br />No • <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />0 Yes <br />No • <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />❑X Yes <br />No • <br />Were all sensors casually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />X Yes <br />❑ <br />❑ No • <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br />interfere with their proper operation? <br />Yes <br />No • <br />x N/A <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />❑X Yes <br />❑ No • <br />❑ N/A <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down ifthe piping secondary containment <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to o erate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive <br />shut -down? (check all that apply) ff Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Oyes No <br />❑x Yes <br />❑ No • <br />® N/A <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical <br />overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating <br />properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90 % <br />0 Yes` <br />® No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />❑X Yes" <br />❑ No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) ® Product; <br />Qx Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />x❑ Yes <br />❑ No * <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br />❑x Yes <br />❑ No • <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications? <br />" In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.