My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1985-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HUNTER
>
642
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231148
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1985-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2021 4:42:26 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:44:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1985-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0231148
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0000799
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON MOBIL #1
STREET_NUMBER
642
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
HUNTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
642 N HUNTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231148_642 N HUNTER_1985-2003.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
396
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software <br />eerVersion Installed: <br />(' nmrdi to the following checklist: <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />#fir' � ,�� �• • j <br />a <br />w <br />Page 2 of 3 03/01 <br />-E] No* <br />Is the audible alarm o erational? <br />WYe <br />E)No* <br />Is the visual alarm o erational? <br />ElNo* <br />Were all sensors visual] ins ected, functional] tested, and confirmed o erational? <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their proper operation? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ o* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />N/A <br />operational? <br />UT Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />❑ N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operat ' " electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm 2ositive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑ No. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑o* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.no <br />N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill oint(s) and o erating properly? If so, at what Eercent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br />❑ Yes*Uf <br />No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />❑ Yes* <br />No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ <br />Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />s <br />El No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure 2roper settings? Attach set u2 reports, if applicable <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is all monitoring a ui mento erational 2er manufacturer's s ecifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />#fir' � ,�� �• • j <br />a <br />w <br />Page 2 of 3 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.