My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2012-2017
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
430
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231425
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2012-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2020 3:36:41 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:47:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2012-2017
RECORD_ID
PR0231425
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003838
FACILITY_NAME
Frontier California Inc.: Manteca CO
STREET_NUMBER
430
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
St
City
Manteca
Zip
95336
APN
217-021-04
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
430 W Center St
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231425_430 W CENTER_2012-2017.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: 16.05 <br />Comolete the followina checklist: <br />150710-319 <br />HEGEIVEC <br />R Yes <br />= No' <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />x Yes <br />No` <br />is the visual alarm operational? <br />9 YesNo' <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />i� Yes <br />No' <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their <br />proper operation? <br />k Yes <br />H No' <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />N/A <br />E] Yes <br />0 No` <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system <br />k, N/A <br />detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check att that apply) <br />G Sump/Trench Sensors; t Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confine positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor <br />failure/disconnection? .; Yes; C:l No. <br />Yes <br />Ne <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention <br />N/A <br />valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent <br />of tank capacity does the alarm tr? go./. <br />Yes' <br />x No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? if yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />0 Yes' <br />9 No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) D Product; p Water. If <br />s, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />x Yes <br />No` <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />ae Yes <br />Ne <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Also tested piping vault sensor 794380-320 unable to test polisher sensor as <br />unit is disabled and powered down. <br />Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 12W <br />FA <br />2/21/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.