My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JACKSON
>
2501
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231488
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2021 12:06:22 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:49:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2013-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231488
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003910
FACILITY_NAME
H&M - BW #98
STREET_NUMBER
2501
STREET_NAME
JACKSON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2501 JACKSON AVE
P_LOCATION
06
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231488_2501 JACKSON_2013-2018.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
516
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mar.21. 2016 9:33AM No.2450P. 3 <br />MWituring apirm UrtilICULion is 0 <br />H Ec;t <br />_D <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version MAR 12016 <br />Camnlete thp. ffilinwino Pho.eklith <br />® Yes <br />0 No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />0 Yes <br />[j No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />0 Yes <br />[] No* <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />0 Yes <br />0 No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their proper operation? <br />9 Yes <br />D NO <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modem) operational? <br />0 N/A <br />Yes <br />0 No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />0 N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? if yes, which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) [@ Sump/Trench Sensors; 0 Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shutdown due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? 0 Yes; 0 No. <br />0 Yes <br />0 No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no <br />0 N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill <br />point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 95% <br />0 Yes* <br />0 No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />[j Yes* <br />14 No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br />1 <br />0 Product; 0 Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />n No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />LyooyeessE <br />0 No* <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.