My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1993-1998
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
25651
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231628
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1993-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:13 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:50:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1993-1998
RECORD_ID
PR0231628
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003835
FACILITY_NAME
SMK CHEVRON
STREET_NUMBER
25651
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
APN
00514120
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25651 N HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231628_25651 N HWY 99_1993-1998.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E <br />C <br />11. A mechanical line leak: detector <br />( ) was NA <br />( ) was not <br />present in the majority of the pipeline systems used in the evaluation. <br />12. Please specify how much time elapsed between the delivery of product and the start of the <br />data collection: NA <br />( )0to6h <br />( )6to 12h <br />( ) 12 to24h <br />( ) 24 h or more <br />Temperature Conditions <br />This system was evaluated under the range of temperature conditions specified in Table 1. <br />The difference between the temperature of the product circulated through the pipeline for 1 h or <br />more and the average temperature of the backfill and soil between 2 and 12 in. from the pipeline <br />is surnmarized in Table 1. If Option 1.2 or 5 was used, a more detailed summary of the product <br />temperature conditions generated for the evaluation is presented in Attachment 4. If Option 3 or <br />4 was used, no artificial temperature conditions were generated. <br />Table 1. Summary of Temperature Conditions Used in the Evaluation <br />Minimum Number of <br />Conditions Required <br />Number of Conditions Used* <br />Range of AT PFI - <br />1 <br />2 <br />AT < -25 <br />4 <br />8 <br />-35 5AT<-15 <br />5 <br />10 <br />-15 <®T <-5 <br />5 <br />8 <br />-5 < AT < +5 <br />5 <br />12 <br />+5 < AT < +15 <br />4 <br />8 <br />+15 5 AT < +25 <br />1 <br />2 <br />AT > 25 <br />`This column should be filled out only if Option 1. 2. or 5 was used. <br />AT is the difference between the temperature of the product dispensed through the pipeline for over an hour prior <br />to the conduct of a test and the average temperature of the backfill and soil surrounding the pipe. <br />Data Used to Make Performance Estimates <br />13. The induced leak rate and the test results used to estimate the performance of this system are <br />summarized in Attachment 5. Were any test runs removed from the data set? <br />(X)no <br />( ) yes <br />If yes, please specify the reason and include with Attachment 5. (If more than one test was <br />removed, specify each reason separately.) <br />Pipeline Leak Detection System - Results Form Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.