Laserfiche WebLink
n 1983. the State of California en- <br />acted new statute: regulating theNo IS am a <br />storage of hazardous substances in <br />tj :ws& Etm "Nolk Own waft m mr <br />underground tanks to prevent these N =AA <br />materials from leaking into the soil and Storage 'lankS Vapor Detection Monitoring <br />groundwater. Of these statutes. the <br />most significant of those enacted was <br />referred to as the Sher Bill (AB 1362) <br />which requires owners/operators of BY LLOYD NELSON & JAY DABLO <br />underground storage tanks containing :•�-�- ,.,�.. - ,..,TM.. -•--r <br />hazardous substances to obtain a r- ��- {{ � 'L' '''• ' <br />mit for each tank. However,° ' -r® .»'s.Jl. '} -t e. • 'a� <br />a permit a'.:. _ •:' ;` .,. ... • . .;.,-•^,'; ;� '. <br />COUId not be issued UnIGSS It was shown` '7® �s<pA's -+" ~sy t�'•✓ •^•»1 �►*e°; <br />Figure 1' " <br />that the tank had not <br />o been leaking and <br />a leak detection system Was Installed ' .•, f 't .• •. s•-.'. . -'• ::a r• • , ... 1• • •P <br />to monitor the tank. In addition, all ELL .LOCATION ' PLAN <br />new tanks installed after January 1, - <br />1984 must have secondary containment • ;5;. ,' •- - , ; ,. i <br />a teak detection system. <br />p0 this legislation. a `_ v �I .y"'-jV'..i <br />In response t® .- j ' r . %a • t. •q- ` '�{', •m ;h �^`. y <br />T': <br />number of cities ado <br />pled underground <br />tank ordinances requiring an applica- <br />tion and permit as aw "Underground <br />Hazardous Substance Storage Facil- <br />ity," a tank assessment program in- <br />cluding a determination of the soil and N `t "^ •• <br />water conditions at the site, design and ::� •J �' Ln;, °.'yv• vtgcc}� 1; s: ': y,� em•.; s; �iw•e.>....':• t'y <br />•e. <br />installation of an appropriate monitor- <br />ing system which at a minimum. must •a ;•;�' ' , tan t" ^,.�;•;._ . •• `. _ <br />be capable of detecting leakage on a <br />continuous electronic bast:. ♦ 4A': k• I e�A �e .•'. 1. `. �•.J 1 t °Cl t#Ied 6m10 !.!�a` , e•. .. <br />.. .� .� • ` •-tar_.�� _;,,re' ` ... <br />Case Study Facility <br />Description / ►' <br />The facility used in this case study "`'_ _ is a manufacturing plant which pro- t ' , , `� ; -': e <br />duces a variety of control devices and '��°' ' w'�1o~ ' w°vti.:rot. t:e®/' .r • " t.• ••° ' " `'AL <br />'' r <br />ttatga , <br />is located in the City of Vernon, ap- BaM ` ®e <br />proximately 10 miles southeast of <br />downtown Los Angeles. In order to e®. eo.wtet swo <br />facilitate fueling of the company's au- _ _ '—--' --- -----•-- <br />tomobiles and the delivery vehicle, two 7 <br />Aos„sa,n4te eertei!t ar <br />underground storage tanks were in- • p 4puke atm. faits <br />stalled in 1979 and 1981. The tanks <br />each have a capacity'of 8000 gallons ' ' :----------------------------..__-•• <br />arc 8 feet in diameter by 24 <br />feet in length. (See Figures t and 2 <br />respectively.) -• V 3a1 v.Wt ewtt <br />Alluvial deposits of recent origin t_J Post section <br />underlie the site. The deposits consist = _ <br />of mixtures of sand, silt and clay de- <br />posited by the Los Angeles River, lo- <br />cated less than one mile to the north `' • "N <br />of the site. The alluvial deposits are <br />predominately sandy and have mod- <br />trate to high permeability and trans- located at depths of 230 to 250 feet groundwater surface and the ori; <br />missivity. A thick clay aquiclude is below the surface, although isolated high permeability of the soils. a r <br />present at depths of approximately 73 areas of perched groundwater are itoring system which relied on rr <br />to 90 feet below the ground surface. present along the river. toring groundwater was dcterminr <br />The permanent groundwater surface is Due to the great depth of the be unacceptable because of the <br />"Waninsis.Materiak & Wsue Menspemem Mapasinc//uly-Autuo 19PA <br />