Laserfiche WebLink
r` <br />• <br />'w.es made to the facility at 9:00 AM. <br />At approximately 6:30 AM on No- <br />vember 13, the vapor detection system <br />went into alarm mode indicating a po- <br />tential leak In the system. The chart <br />records graph showed that combusti- <br />ble vapors were initially detected at <br />4:45 AM on November 13. Inspection <br />of the graph indicated that the vapors <br />began to dissipate at approximately <br />11:00 AM on November 13. which <br />pointed to an isolated single dose event <br />as the cause of alarm. Had the alarm <br />been due to a continuous leak from a <br />gasoline tank rupture, the level of <br />combustible vapors detected by the <br />system would have been expected to <br />remain constant or continue to in- <br />crease. Since this was not the case. <br />further investigation was undertaken <br />to locate the source. Inspection of the <br />fill pipe access boxes detected a strong <br />gasoline odor in the soil at the bonom <br />of one of the boxes. Since the bottoms <br />of the boxes were not sealed at that <br />time to prevent overfill, it appears that <br />a small amount of gasoline was spilled <br />during the fulling of the tank and <br />seeped into the surrounding tank back- <br />fill. <br />The gasoline vapors then migrated <br />laterally and were detected by the sen- <br />sors 19 hours and 43 minutes after the <br />spill. The system went into the alarm <br />mode 22 hours after the spill took <br />place. The vapors subsequently dissi- <br />pated sufficiently to allow the system <br />to reset, and no further episodes have <br />occurred. <br />The leak detection episode at the fa- <br />cility provided firsthand evidence of <br />the viability of combustible vapor <br />monitoring as a leak detection method <br />for underground storage tanks contain- <br />ing volatile materials, whether they are <br />hazardous substances, chemicals or <br />waste. And the following conclusions <br />are pertinent to the utilization of the <br />vapor detection systems as an alter- <br />native to groundwater monitoring for <br />leak detection of underground storage <br />tanks: <br />1. Very small leaks can be de- <br />tected by monitoring vapor con- <br />centrations in soil vapor wells. In <br />this particular case. probably less <br />C; <br />than ot.e gallon was spilled during <br />the felling operations. <br />2. Combustible vapors migrate <br />rapidly through the soils. partic- <br />ularly in granular backfill. In this <br />can, the vapors migrated 13 feet <br />in 19.75 hours or 0.66 feet per <br />hour. The subsurface configurs- <br />Con of the tanks and vapor wells <br />are shown in Figure 2. <br />3. Based on the migration rates, <br />an effective radius of influence for <br />a vapor soil detection system in a <br />24-hour period would be approx- <br />imately 15 fat. <br />4. Due to the sensitivity of the va- <br />por detection system, all pathways <br />to the subsurface must be sealed <br />to prevent infiltration of the sur- <br />face contamination. These path- <br />ways include: <br />a. Bottom of all fill pipe access <br />boxes: <br />b. Bottom of all monitoring or <br />soil vapor well access boxes-. <br />c. Any major cracks and joints <br />in the concrete or asphalt pave- <br />ments. <br />3. In areas where the groundwater <br />surface is at considerable depths <br />(greater than 30 feet), it is imper- <br />ative that an alternative to ground- <br />water monitoring be used to <br />provide the earliest possible de- <br />tection of tank leaks and therefore <br />minimize contamination of the <br />subsurface. For tanks which store <br />motor fuel and other volatile haz- <br />ardous materials or waste, a vapor <br />detection system is a viable option <br />which has been proven in field ap- <br />plications. <br />(Editor's Comment: The coming dec- <br />ade will require massive resting, re- <br />medial and removal etpenditures to <br />meet the expected promulgation of <br />Federal Standards for Underground <br />Storage Tanks in 1987 and 1988.) <br />About the Author: HMWM is indebted <br />to Mr. Loyd Nelson. Hazardous Ma- <br />terials tic Waste Manager of the Barks- <br />dale Control Division of Transamerica <br />Delaval and Mr. !ay Dablow, Etec- <br />utive Vice President of Hydro -Fluent <br />Inc. who engineered the vapor moni- <br />toring system. <br />Techniques And Practices For <br />Managing UndergTound Storage Tanks <br />Firms currently using or planning to use underground storage <br />tanks, service station operators, design engineers. environmental <br />and safety engineers, and fire prevention specialists - all will <br />benefit from this reference manual. <br />It's a guide with more than 200 pages on installation, leak <br />testing, tank lining, and tank abandonment for underground <br />storage tanks. Charts and illustrations aid in understanding safe <br />procedures. <br />A quick reference index and spiral binding make in -the -field <br />use practical. <br />Special sections address: <br />Installation requirements <br />Consensus standards and industry practices <br />• Currosion protection <br />Testing methods <br />• Owner/operator liabilities <br />Spill clean-up techniques <br />The $59.95 price includes all shipping and handling charges. <br />To order your copy, send check or money order for $59.95 to: <br />Materials & Waate Mana`emcm Ma`auindJuly-Aust 1986 <br />L.A. Weaver Co. <br />308 E .cones St. <br />Raleigh, NC 27501 <br />(919) 832-8242 Circle No. 163 on Rcafer inquiry Card <br />33 <br />