My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2008
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
907
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231871
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 3:51:51 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1998-2008
RECORD_ID
PR0231871
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003968
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T California - UE046
STREET_NUMBER
907
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95207
APN
077-470-07
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
907 W Lincoln Rd
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231871_907 W LINCOLN_1998-2008.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification <br /> Site Address: 907 LINCOLN RD. STOCKTON,CA. Date of Testing/Servicing: 08-16-2007 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 121.00 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ® No* Were all sensors visually ins ected, functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ® No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> ❑ N/A operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ® N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors: ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> ® N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fillpoint(s)and operating ro erl ? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? ???'*1% <br /> ® Yes* ❑ No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes ® No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? <br /> ❑ Yes ® No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Insert VR Probe Number as a check box for each tank under section B <br /> CHANGED 794380-352 SENSORS IN FILL SUMP AND MIDDLE SUMP TO 794380-208 SENSORS. <br /> NO OTHER SENSORS OR PROBES WERE INSPECTED OR TESTED AT THIS TIME. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> t <br /> e <br /> P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.