My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2011-2013
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
1617
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231923
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2011-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2024 2:06:52 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:53:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2011-2013
RECORD_ID
PR0231923
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003606
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 05450
STREET_NUMBER
1617
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13511015
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1617 W FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231923_1617 W FREMONT_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C <br />Facility Name: Arco #5450 <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />(Page 2) <br />11 <br />Software Version Installed: 333.01 <br />®Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />®Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />®Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the print function operational? <br />®Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />®Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other <br />equipment will not interfere with their proper operation? <br />®Yes <br />❑ No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. <br />❑ N/A <br />modem) operational? <br />_70 -Yes <br />No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary <br />❑ N/A <br />containment monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If <br />yes: which sensors initiate positive shutdown? (Check all that apply) ® Sump Sensors; <br />Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shutdown due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes; ❑ No. <br />® <br />❑ No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device, is <br />❑ N/A <br />the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? At <br />Yes <br />what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90% <br />®Yes* <br />❑ No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other <br />equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section <br />E, below. <br />®Yes* <br />❑ No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all <br />that a /) ❑ Product; ® Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />®Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if <br />applicable <br />®Yes <br />[:]No* <br />Is all monitoring equipment oerational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.