Laserfiche WebLink
M <br /> environment due to natural factors, and therefore does not meet any of the elements (intrusion, precipitation, <br /> infiltration, or runoff) identified in either analysis above. In addition,the majority of the liquid was produced after the <br /> system was opened for testing, a status not contemplated under this regulation, as it pertains to a closed system. <br /> Lastly, all of the sumps at issue are continuously monitored for liquid infiltration and/or accumulation by 208 sensors, <br /> which are set to positively shut down the site if triggered and prevent any further operations until the liquid is <br /> removed. Therefore, in the event there is water intrusion or infiltration,the second clause of the above-referenced <br /> section has also been met(means of monitoring for water intrusion, etc.). <br /> Based on the analysis above, we respectfully request a rescission of this violation. Will you please review the reasoning <br /> and let me know your thoughts? <br /> Thanks very much! <br /> Sarah Samuels <br /> Retail Compliance Coordinator <br /> BP—Fuels North America <br /> 36o.526.3917 phone <br /> 36o•255.9743 cell <br /> This message is intended for review by the named addressee(s)only and may be privileged,confidential or private. If <br /> you are not the named addressee(s),please delete this message and do not retain a copy. Inadvertent disclosure of this <br /> message does not constitute a waiver of any privilege. <br /> 2 <br />