My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1986-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOCKEFORD
>
205
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232257
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1986-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2023 1:44:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:54:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1986-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0232257
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0000670
FACILITY_NAME
QUIK STOP MARKET #3148*
STREET_NUMBER
205
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LOCKEFORD
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04116115
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
205 W LOCKEFORD ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0232257_205 W LOCKEFORD_1986-2003.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />D. ' Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: 16,0v <br />Complete the followin checklist: <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Page 2 of 3 03101 <br />❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm o rational? <br />❑ No* <br />Is the visual alarm o tional? <br />JM <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors visual! ins ted, functional! tested, and confirmed o tional? <br />r <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment willnot <br />interfere with their re o ration? <br />❑ No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />.9 N/A <br />operational? <br />❑ No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />❑ N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply),.p Sump/Trench Sensors; UU)ispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Yes; ❑ No. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill int(s) and operating ro rl ? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? g'o <br />❑ Yes* <br />No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />❑ Yes* <br />jE] No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ <br />Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is all monitoring ui ment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Page 2 of 3 03101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.