My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2008
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
2512
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232418
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2023 2:05:39 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:55:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1999-2008
RECORD_ID
PR0232418
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0004064
FACILITY_NAME
WATERLOO LIQUOR
STREET_NUMBER
2512
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14128102
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2512 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0232418_2512 E WATERLOO_1999-2008.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Apr 15 05 11:2Ga Rf da -Test <br />p. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />Comps the following checklist. <br />420 84-0112 p.5 <br />* 11m Section E below, dewibe how ADO when these dexiclencies were or wux ue cera <br />9 <br />❑ No* <br />is the audible alarm operational? <br />los <br />Q No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />Q No* <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed opermtiomal? <br />Yes <br />O No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment <br />not interfere with their proper operation? <br />❑ Yes <br />13N <br />If alarms arc relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equip ment (e.g. mod <br />d/A <br />operational? <br />Ycs <br />G No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containsx <br />[IM/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which.sensors init <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) /I`rench Sensors; aspenscr Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? CI -Yes; Q No, <br />For tank systea:m% that utilize file monitoring system as the primarytank overfill warning device (ie. <br />Q yes <br />N�oM <br />�® <br />1 1v/A <br />mechanical ove�ll Prevention. valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at ti c t; <br />fill poi nt(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? <br />D Yes* <br />No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment repla( <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section Is, below. <br />la Yes* <br />U No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment system designed as dry systems? (Check all that app <br />CI Product; OrWater. If yes, describe causes. in Section S, below. <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />Xcs <br />Q No* <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />* 11m Section E below, dewibe how ADO when these dexiclencies were or wux ue cera <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.