COMPLIANCE INFO_2011-2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

/gUl/y II � ? rL aua 1 1� :� dim qCr 6' TO: TO: FROM: DATE: RE: San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department 600 East Main Street Stockton, California 95202-3029 Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Phone: (209) 468-3420 Fax: (209) 464-0138 David Irey, Supervising Deputy District Attorney San Joaquin County District Attorney's Office Environmental Prosecution Unit Donna Heran, RENS, Director ' San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department July 5, 2011 Waterloo Liquor 2512 E. Waterloo Road Stockton, CA 95205 I. CASE SUMMARY DIRECTOR Donna Heran, REHS PROGRAM COORDINATORS Robert McClellon, REHS Jeff Carruesco, REHS, RDI Kasey Foley, REHS Linda Turkatte. REHS Waterloo Liquor is a gasoline and diesel dispensing facility with an underground storage tank (UST) system consisting of a 15,000 -gallon UST that holds 87 -octane gasoline, an 8,000 -gallon UST that holds diesel, a 4,000 -gallon UST that holds 91 -octane gasoline, and two dispensers. The 8,000 and 4,000 -gallon USTs are each part of a two- compartment tank. On January 5, 2006, secondary containment testing was performed. All components that were tested passed and a test report, required to be submitted within 30 days of testing, was submitted two months late on April 11, 2006 (Attachment 1). On September 11, 2006, the annual monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing were performed without a witness from the EHD. A test report was submitted with copies of the alarm printout of the testing (Attachment 2). On October 17, 2006, Mr. Toua Yang, Registered Environmental Health Specialist (RENS), San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD), performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 3) and found approximately one inch of liquid in the diesel piping sump. Upon review of the facility's paperwork, Mr. Yang found that current financial responsibility documents had not been submitted to the EHD, current and approved monitoring and response plans were not found on site, the daily alarm log was inadequate, and employees were not trained by the designated operator. On December 7, 2006, employee training records by the designated operator and a corrective actions statement were submitted (Attachment 4). On January 2, 2007, financial responsibility documents were submitted (Attachment 5).