My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2008-2011
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
2375
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232469
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2008-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2021 2:40:22 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:56:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2008-2011
RECORD_ID
PR0232469
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003772
FACILITY_NAME
GRANT LINE SHELL*
STREET_NUMBER
2375
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
21402017
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2375 W GRANT LINE RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\G\GRANT LINE\2375\PR0232469\FINAL JUDGMENT 11-06-09.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
564
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Work Order: 2267813 <br /> Monitoring-System Certification-Page 2 of 3 <br /> Site Address: Z3T5 W. Grant Ling @t-205 mate of T'esti!tgiServicing: <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed- <br /> Complete the folio Ing checklist: <br /> FRIs ❑ No* is the audible alarm operational? ______s_ ❑ No* is the visual alarm_operational? <br /> f� b,y-,s G No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operation I? <br /> B`Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> � riot interfere with their proper operation? <br /> Et'1'es ❑ No* if alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station. is all communications equipment(e.g. modern) <br /> ❑ N,'A operational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shat down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, r is electrically disconnected^ If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check ull thou a/)pO tTSutiip/Trench Sensors: �spe nscr Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? des ❑ No <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e. no <br /> t3<MiA mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm v'iisible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly'? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trie.ger? _% <br /> cs* ❑ No Was anv monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors,probeys,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,'beloiv. _ <br /> ❑ Yes* o Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check uli"hat um)Y <br /> ❑ Product.❑ Water. Ifves,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> e ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? t:gttach set-tip re.or=s, i o 7 hcohle.l <br /> es ❑ No* is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? i <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: i C - <br /> IUF Y�, � JL.r)SL�� <br /> 3S, , -+ e� QCj rho__ l;0C. .r,cor- J,,+ <br /> Tanknology Inc. 8501 N.MoPac Expressway,Suite 400,Austin,Texas 78759 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.