Laserfiche WebLink
UndergrOLKW MMageTa 39-PFJ-617 <br /> OpWdtKW Monft Vinal ' n C) <br /> monthly Designated Operator Inspections Rev.'11/18/2011 <br /> (949)458•USTO(8786) MOnth.T JANUARY Year: 2014 <br /> ?A Facility I PTO ExD.Date: DORnspecton ate: Designated UST Operator Conducting theInspection: <br /> FA0012979 12/31/2013 -jp. Z3 ,UA LANCE YORK <br /> Facility Name: international a Council Ceffication#and Expiration ate: <br /> PILOT/ FLYING J - LODI x#617 5296385-UC / SEPTEMBER 1, 2014 <br /> Facility UST OwnerI Operator Facility Contact; DO Stamp and Signature., <br /> PILOT /FLYING J JOSE JIMENQ <br /> , actll'—F�ty Address: /Q'� ypt10E <br /> 15100 THORNTON P.D. <br /> LODI, CA 95242 ;;d U Exp8"Pt � <br /> i Contact Phone#: i <br /> j (209) 339-4066 <br /> Checklist instructions. <br /> A UST Designated Operator(DO),who possesses a current"California UST <br /> i System Operator"certification issued by the International Code Council(ICC) 4°c tF04 <br /> must conduct a monthly visual inspection of the UST system. <br /> The DO must provide a copy of this monthly visual inspection checklist to the <br /> UST Owner or Operator. <br /> The DO must alert the UST Owner or Operator of any condition discovered <br /> during the monthly visual inspection that may require follow-up actions. <br /> The UST Owner or Operator must maintain a copy of this monthly visual <br /> inspection checklist and all attachments for the previous 12 months.The records pnatltre of D ted Operator <br /> i must be maintained on-site,or,if approved by the local Certified Unified Program Confi Inspection <br /> LAgency(CUPA)or their designate,off-site at a readily available location. <br /> 1. Is the monitoring system powered on and in the proper operating mode(i.e.,functional and not bypassed)? ❑ ❑ <br /> 2. Does the monitoring system show a3 current alarms or warnings(i.e.,"all functions normal')? ❑ ❑ <br /> 3. Is an alarm history report or log for the previous month available and has it been reviewed by the DO?" ❑ ❑ <br /> `Attach a copy of the Alarm History ReporYLxq to the Vic if evadable.if rot available,explain why not in Genual Commanis section. <br /> 4. Has each environmental alarm for the previous month been responded to appropriately,according to the <br /> response log and/or maintenance records?(NOTE:Non-environmental alarms such as for paper replacernera.printer error,low ❑ ❑ <br /> product,fuel delivery needed,and invalid fuel level,if related to low product in the tank do not need to be logged.All others do). <br /> No environmental alarms since last 00 inspection on <br /> 5. Have as tank-top containment sump sensor alarms been triggered within the past month? ❑ O <br /> 52. Ust all tank-top sump alarms triggered In the past month below. (Attach service records for each alarm response) ❑ <br /> 7Zo No record <br /> I $- l-1$ ❑ No record <br /> I PX-51P1� 5. Q, LLD, t ! Z ❑ No record <br /> L -2 �sL.' Z- al�Nt�tArt-• QA-�A iz t2� S:SZ - :�O c�� Z7`fZ� ❑ No record <br /> i.MWJDED 5 7.m t loLY ❑ No record <br /> ❑ No record <br /> For any sump alarms noted in 5a above with no record of a qualified service technician response,answer questions 6 and 6a below. N/A P4 <br /> 6. Are tank-top sumps presently free of water,debris,and 6a. Are tank-top sump probes presently properly located(i.e.,at <br /> hazardous substances? lowest point in sump)? <br /> (Use General Comments section to rote additional details as needed) (Use General Comments section to rote additional details as needed) <br /> ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> ET- <br /> 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> >< a ❑ ❑ ❑ o 11❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />