COMPLIANCE INFO_2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Alaniz, John From: Chris Young <chris@premierfinishing.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 12:14 PM To: Alaniz, John Cc: Backus, Garrett Subject: RE: RTC violations Attachments: Burn Off Ash TCLP Castle Report 1909047addon.pdf Good afternoon John, This response is In regards to the RTC violation 102 (#4,#5 the burn off ash) We contacted the lab and ask them to run the TCLP testing on the burn off ash. Here is the tclp test results.All results are well below the limits. If you have any question please contact me. Have a great day From:Alaniz,John <jalanizl@sjgov.org> Sent:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 4:01 PM To: Chris Young<chris@premierfinishing.com> Cc: Backus, Garrett<gbackus@sjgov.org> Subject: FW: RTC violations HI Chris, Thank you for the response. The Storm Drain Waste is OK. Although a TCLP was not needed on the second sample, a TCLP was needed for the first sample. We still have a concern, especially with the way the waste is generated (burned), that a TCLP could fail. There are three ways to get this resolved: 1) If barium sulfate does not degrade in the burning process (provide evidence), provide a statement from DTSC saying a TCLP would not be required. DTSC has a Regulatory Assistance Office that can be contacted at RAO@dtsc.ca.gov or 1-800-728-6942. 2) Run a TCLP analysis on the ash waste. 3) Provide a statement that the facility does not intend to do anything else. Thank You, John Alaniz From: Chris Young [mailto:chris@premierfinishing.com] Sent:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 2:38 PM To:Alaniz,John <jalanizl@sigov.org> Subject: RE: RTC violations The sanders dust that contaminated the paint booth filters is a hazardous waste you have a manifest in your possession already, showing the sanding dust going out as haz-waste. 4/5) Burned off ash/4x4 area: We still have concern that a TCLP test (federal)was not run on the burned off ash. 1