Laserfiche WebLink
6) The incorrect TTLC testing was done on the storm drain testing. The report says that method E200.8 was used on a <br /> sample where over 1%was "sediment content." Wastewater with solids greater than 0.5% require a different testing to <br /> be done. Please see Title 22 California Code of Regulations 66261.24(a)(2)(A)for more information. <br /> 7) The captured sanding waste is being disposed of as non-RCRA hazardous waste. I did not see any TCLP test results for <br /> chromium (250 mg/kg). Was chromium tested for TCLP? <br /> 8) The paint booth filters showed a TTLC of 10,000 mg/Kg.This number is high enough to make the filters a non-RCRA <br /> hazardous waste without STLC testing. I also did not see any TCLP testing performed for Barium. Please explain why the <br /> waste was categorized as non-hazardous. If the waste has already been disposed of, please submit the disposal record <br /> to the EHD. <br /> 9) The red 5 gallon bucket was properly labeled. OK <br /> 10) The results show that the sand blast media is non-hazardous. OK. <br /> Note: One of the manifests for violation 102 was not legible. Please send it again. This can be done via email. <br /> If you have any questions, please let me know. <br /> Thank You, <br /> John Alaniz <br /> REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 E Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209)468-3147 <br /> Fax: (209)468-3433 <br /> Please note, my email address has changed to ialanizl@sieov.ore. <br /> 3 <br />