Laserfiche WebLink
Captain Kenneth Koop - 2 - 12 September 2002 <br /> CARNG Facility- Stockton <br /> 4. The PA/SI Report recommended further investigation of the drainage ditch in the Combined <br /> Support and Maintenance Shop (CSMS),but no sampling is proposed in the Work Plan. Discrete <br /> sampling of surface and shallow subsurface soil in the drainage ditch should be added to the Work <br /> Plan. At a minimum samples should be analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons and metals. The <br /> PA/SI Report recommended only petroleum hydrocarbons and zinc,but samples should be <br /> analyzed for a full-suite of metals. The previous metals results were from composite samples, so <br /> zinc may not be the only metal of concern. <br /> 5. The investigation of the uplifted areas does not include sampling. While it would be impossible to <br /> select the contaminants of concern in advance of uncovering the source of the uplift, the Work Plan <br /> should have a contingency for sampling any suspect soils/materials that are excavated. A <br /> contingency for sampling the uplifted areas should be added to the Work Plan. The plan should <br /> include contacting the CVRWQCB if potential soil contamination or potential hazardous materials <br /> are uncovered. <br /> 6. During the PA/SI, soil samples were collected beneath the sand blasting area(Boring B11) and <br /> former waste storage area(Boring B10). Even though these areas were potential surface release <br /> sites, soil samples were collected at depths of 5 feet below the sand blasting area and 10 feet below <br /> the waste storage area. The potential metals contamination associated with sand blasting area is <br /> unlikely to migrate far vertically and a surface sample (or sample from just below the pavement if <br /> the area is completely paved) should have been collected along with the 5-foot soil sample to <br /> assess whether any surface contamination is present. Please collect a surface soil or sample just <br /> below the pavement and analyze it for metals to complete assessment of the sandblasting area. <br /> Similarly, contamination caused by leaks from the waste storage area are more likely to affect the <br /> near-surface soils and some petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was detected at a depth of 10 <br /> feet. Concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons may be much higher in the near-surface soils. At <br /> a minimum, soil samples should be collected from the surface and 5 feet bgs to characterize this <br /> potential source area. Samples should be analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons, SVOCs, and <br /> metals. VOCs do not appear to be a concern as none were detected in the soil vapor sample <br /> collected in this area during the PA/SI. <br /> Specific Comments <br /> 1. Page 9, Section 3.5: Photographs of all soils and materials excavated from the uplift areas should <br /> be taken. Include photodocumentation as one of the activities that will be conducted during <br /> excavation of the uplift areas. <br /> 2. Table 2: The analytical methods listed in this table contain many erroneous method numbers. For <br /> example, the table indicates you will be using EPA Methods 8260, 8261, 8262, 8263, and 8264 to <br /> analyze for oxygenates that may be present in soil samples collected from Boring B28. EPA <br /> Method 8260 is the correct method for oxygenates. These erroneous method numbers should be <br /> corrected. <br />