My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STIMSON
>
2000
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009229
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2020 7:53:06 PM
Creation date
6/26/2020 4:46:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009229
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004047
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON ARMY AIR SUPPORT FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2000
STREET_NAME
STIMSON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17726004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2000 STIMSON ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Marcus Pierce [PierceM@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:09 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: California Army National Guard Site, 8010 Airport WayandStimson Road <br /> If they didn't apply for a boring permit, I suspect that the field work <br /> was not conducted. However, with this project anything is possible. <br /> They also gave me a revised copy (dated July 2003) of the 2000 <br /> investigation report - I think it addresses some of my comments on the <br /> draft, but I still need to verify this assumption. <br /> I will request that copies of both documents be sent to you and ask <br /> Versar about the field work. <br /> Marcus <br /> >>> "Mike Infurna [EH] " <MInfurna@sjcehd.com> 09/11/03 02:45PM >>> <br /> holy, wholly, wow. . <br /> NO. . <br /> I haven't received a revised work plan, nor did I know about last <br /> months' (Aug 03) start date. . . <br /> have they done the work? Were there borings proposed? have they been <br /> done? <br /> could be a nightmare if they did. . . .I haven't issued a permit. <br /> Last I had was a 'combined' work plan that included all facilities at <br /> the rough location. . .8010 Airport, 8020 Airport and 2000 <br /> Stimson. . .initials like OMC, AAS, plus others. .I had concerns over <br /> borings for UST in areas not impacted by USTs and looking for things NOT <br /> held in the UST. .never got an answer from VERSAR,nor word one since I <br /> left a unreturned message to some full bird Colonel up in Sac. . . <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Marcus Pierce [mailto:PierceM@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:33 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: California Army National Guard Site, 8010 Airport Way <br /> andStimson Road <br /> Hi Mike, <br /> I received the revised "Work Plan for Preliminary Assessment/Site <br /> Investigation Update" a few days ago. Apparently, the report was <br /> issued <br /> to CANG by Versar in July 2003 and the Work Plan indicates the field <br /> work is scheduled for August 2003. I did not receive a distribution <br /> list for the Work Plan, so I am wondering if you got a copy of this <br /> overdue document. Did you? <br /> Marcus Pierce <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.