My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
3012
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522786
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2020 3:10:30 PM
Creation date
6/30/2020 1:55:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0522786
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0015536
FACILITY_NAME
ARROYOS SMOG SHOP
STREET_NUMBER
3012
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14313024
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3012 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'ABLE 1 -CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Arroyo's Smog Shop,3012 E. Waterloo Rd., Stockton,San Joaquin County(RB#391158) <br /> Y 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, A 2013 sensitive receptor survey reported three(3) <br /> agriculture,industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site. water supply wells located 2,000'to the south, west, <br /> and north,respectively. None of the wells are <br /> threatened by the release. <br /> Y 2. Site maps, to scale,of area impacted showing locations of any In 9/98, three 4,000-gallon gasoline and one <br /> former and existing tank systems, excavation contours and 550-gallon waste oil USTs were removed. Site maps <br /> sample locations,boring and monitoring well elevation and figures showing tank locations, excavations, <br /> contours,gradients,and nearby surface waters,buildings, building and residual pollutants were provided in <br /> streets,and subsurface utilities; investigation reports. <br /> Y1 3.Figures depicting lithology(cross Site lithology consists of clay,silt,and sand to 70', the total depth investigated. <br /> section), treatment system diagrams; No treatment system was constructed. <br /> Y 4.Stockpiled soil remaining on-site Approximately 18 tons of over-excavated soil was reportedly disposed at <br /> or off-site disposal uanti or Waste Management, Kettleman Hills Facility near Kettleman City. <br /> l5.Monitoring wells remaining on-site, Three(3)monitoring wells(MW-1 through MW-3)will be properly destroyed prior <br /> I to closure. <br /> 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater Depth to groundwater varied from 42'bgs to 59'bgs. Groundwater flow <br /> elevations and depths to water; direction was predominantly southwest(also southeast and northwest). <br /> Groundwater gradient varied from 0.001 ft/ft to 0.014 ft/ft. <br /> 7. Tabulated results of all sampling All data adequately tabularized in various reports-including analysis for waste oil <br /> and analyses: analytes. <br /> Y❑ Detection limits for <br /> confirmation sampling <br /> QY Lead analyses <br /> 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in The horizontal and vertical extent of the <br /> soil and groundwater,and both on-site and off-site: petroleum contamination are confined to <br /> the property limits. _ <br /> 0 Lateral and 0 Vertical extent of soil contamination <br /> FYI Lateral and FYI Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> 9.Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface An engineered remediation was not <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and required by the regulatory agency. <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> 10.Reports/information E Unauthorized Release Form [0 QMRs(9)8-05 to 12-12 <br /> R Well and boring logs PAR FRP FV-1 Other No Further Action Report,5-13 <br /> YJ 11.Best Available Technology(BAT)used or an Leak was stopped by removing tanks, use of additional <br /> explanation for not using BAT; cleanup technology was not needed to be protective of <br /> human health and the environment. <br /> Unable <br /> Reasons why background was/is not Soil contamination does not present a threat to human health and <br /> UUnable usin BAT; groundwater pollution is predicted to be restored in 22 years. <br /> Y 13.Mass balance calculation of substance Consultant estimated residual TPH mass as 26.9 lbs.in soil and <br /> treated versus that remaining; 0.35 lbs.in groundwater. <br /> 7I, 14. Assumptions,parameters, calculations Site passed LTCP and Region 2 ESLs above 25'bgs(TPHg,500 mg/kg <br /> and model used in risk assessments,and fate failed ESL direct contact,450 mg/kg at 25'bgs), which is below typical <br /> and transport modeling; worker depths. Consultant states site does not represent a significant <br /> environmental or health risk. <br /> Y 1 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at Soil and groundwater contamination reportedly are onsite.Land use <br /> site will not adversely impact water quality, (commercial)is not expected to change in the foreseeable future. WQGs <br /> health,or other beneficial uses;and will be reached by 2035. Groundwater plume is stable and decreasing in <br /> concentration. <br /> By: JL8 Comments:In 9/98, three 4,000-gallon gasoline and one 550-gallon waste oil USTs were removed at the <br /> subject site.Based on the stable and declining concentrations in groundwater,no foreseeable changes in <br /> Date: future land use(commercial),and no risks from-soil vapor and soil,Regional Board staff concur with San <br /> 7/22/2013 Joaquin County's Closure Recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.