Laserfiche WebLink
Authority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. <br />Reference: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1, 21083, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21151; Sundstrom v. <br />County of Mendocino, 202 Cal. App. 3d 296 (1988); Leonoff v. Board of Supervisors, 222 Cal. App. 3d 1337(1990). <br />On the basis of this initial evaluation and on substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency: <br />I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />will be prepared. <br />❑ I find that the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, however, there will not be a significant <br />effect in this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent (see attached <br />Mitigation Agreement). A ❑ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION or ❑ ADDENDUM to a MITIGATED NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION will be prepared. <br />❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />REPORT (EIR), is required. A ❑ Project EIR; ❑ Staged EIR; or ❑ Program EIR will be prepared. <br />❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have an impact on the environment that is "potentially significant' or "potentially <br />significant unless mitigated" but at least one effect: (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to <br />applicable legal standards and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis, as described on <br />attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) is required, but it must analyze only the effects that <br />remain to be addressed. A ❑ Subsequent EIR; ❑ Supplement to an EIR; or ❑ Addendum to an EIR will be prepared. <br />❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant <br />effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or MITIGATED NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures <br />that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. Specifically, the environmental documentation for the proposed <br />project is provided by the document(s) identified in Section D. above. <br />(Pursuant to the State and City Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, the determination of the Community Development Director <br />may be appealed to the City Planning Commission by submitting a written appeal with the applicable fee to the Community <br />Development Department within ten (10) calendar days following this date of the determination.) <br />JOHN CARLSON, DIRECTOR <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br />By: kaw Date: <br />i(Signatur f Planner) <br />isoa --Te n>,' Liaw <br />(Name and Title of Planner—Typed or Printed) <br />16 <br />(Date of Determination) <br />