Laserfiche WebLink
Table 2 <br /> SUMMARY OF CAPACITY ANALYSIS <br /> WITHOUT MITIGATIONS <br /> EXIST, PERCENT IMPACT <br /> EXIST ECT OF THE PROJECT <br /> PLUS PLUS IN IN <br /> EXIST PROJECT CUMUL CRITICAL TOTAL <br /> INTERSECTION = LOS V V S VO El VOLUME2 <br /> 1. West Lane & 0.69 B 0.82 D 1.97 * 10 % 11 % <br /> Hammertown <br /> 2. Hammer Lane & 0.96 E 1.03 1.44 * 15 $ 5 % <br /> Tam 0°Shanter <br /> 3. S.R. 99 east 0.69 B 0.74 C 2.04 * 4 % 2 % <br /> & Hammer Lane <br /> 4. S.R. 99 west 0.75 C 0.80 C 3.13 * 2 % 2 % <br /> & Hammer Lane <br /> 5. Hammer Lane & 0.54 A 0.55 A 1.89 * i % 2 8 <br /> Lorraine Ave <br /> 6. Hammer Lane & 1.08 * 1.15 3.54 * 3 % 2 % <br /> West Lane <br /> 7. West Lane & 0.85 D 0.85 D 1.22 * 0 $ 2 % <br /> Knickerbocker <br /> 8. West Lane & 0.66 B 0.69 B 0.99 E 9 % 3 $ <br /> Morada Lane <br /> 9. West Lane & 1.08 * 1.1 N/A N/A 3 $ <br /> March Lane <br /> 10 Hammer Lane & 0.63 B 0.65 B 2.66 * 1 % 2 % <br /> Montauban <br /> 11 West Lane & 0.78 C 0.85 D 1.78 * 7 % 4 % <br /> Swain Road <br /> 12 West Lane & 0.95 E 1.05 2.18 * 8 1 $ <br /> Bianchi Rd <br /> * DEMAND EXCEEDS CAPACITY, QUEUING AND BACKUPS WILL OCCUR <br /> 1 This was calculated as follows: <br /> (V/Cproject - V/Cexisting)/(V/Cu ulative - V/Cexisting) <br /> 2 This was calculated by dividing sum of project turning <br /> movement volumes at intersection by the total sum of <br /> turning movements for the cumulative scenario. <br /> Source: TJKM <br /> October, 1986 <br /> 21 <br />