My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504187
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2020 9:27:34 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:34:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0504187
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0006111
FACILITY_NAME
SHARPE ARMY DEPOT
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0504187_850 E ROTH_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that addressed issues of particular importance to the RI/FS are briefly reiterated, <br />and in some cases expanded upon, below. Page references to the Supplementary Soil <br />Investigation Plan are provided in parentheses. <br />16. SHAD states that the groundwater pathway has been qualitatively identified as <br />representing the most significant risk to human health, and contends that direct <br />exposure to contaminated soil and inhalation of dust (from contaminants already <br />identified) do not represent significant human health or environmental risks (pg. 3-2, <br />paragraph 1). The plan cites a study that was then in preparation to support this <br />claim, but the cited report was not referenced in the list of references. What is the <br />basis for the conclusion? <br />17. Regarding the significance of the risk from exposure to soils, it is not possible to <br />evaluate the health risks from exposure to soils that have not been adequately <br />characterized. Since one of the purposes of the supplemental soil investigation is to <br />characterize those soils, it appears that SHAD is making a circular argument in <br />recommending that future characterization of soil contamination should be restricted <br />to compounds already identified in soils, or to those identified in another medium <br />(groundwater). The sampling plan should target compounds that are known to have <br />been used, stored, or disposed of at a particular site. <br />18. SHAD contends that all of the contaminants at certain sites (the fire -training area is <br />the only example provided) were introduced into the environment in the same manner <br />and therefore would be expected to have the same spatial distributions (pg. 3-2, <br />paragraph 2). <br />We agree that all information available to SHAD should be used if it may help <br />narrow the search for contaminant compounds and may provide clues as to their <br />distribution at specific potential source areas. But field verification of assumptions <br />about the types and distributions of compounds is still required. Compounds with low <br />attenuations in soil, such as TCE and other solvents can be expected to reach <br />groundwater long before compounds that are of greater concern in terms of health <br />risk such as dioxins, PCBs, chlorinated phenols, pesticides, polycyclic aromatic <br />hydrocarbons (PAHs), heavy metals and many others expected to be present in some <br />areas of the depot. (See preceding comment.) <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.