My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1968-2013
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
500
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504201
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1968-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2024 2:17:25 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:34:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1968-2013
RECORD_ID
PR0504201
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0000214
FACILITY_NAME
PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA INC PLANT 10
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330-9739
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
500 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0504201_500 E LOUISE_FILE 1_1968-2013.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I V. Surface Conditio <br /> A. Is site access adequately restricted�. (Y/N) <br /> B. Is the waste adequately covered to prevent human contact? <br /> C. Is the final drainage system for the site adequate to prevent erosion? <br /> (Y/N) wo s k ,c cx� f'n�-C/ le oe' <br /> D Is the final grading adequate to promote run-off? (Y/N) <br /> E. Are slopes greater than 3:1 (33% or 18 degrees)? (Y/ A)c <br /> F. Are slopes greater than 1.75:1 (57% or 30 degrees)? (YJ <br /> V. Postclosure Land Use <br /> A. Has the land use of the site significantly changed since Closure? <br /> (Y <br /> If yes, inc ude or reference site improvement plans and answer the following: <br /> 1. Give the date that the improvements were constructed <br /> 2. Have the improvements compromised the integrity of the final <br /> cover? (Y/N/NA) tJ1,4 <br /> 3. Has differential settlement affected the improvements? (Y/N)_.�' <br /> B. Is there a proposed change in postclosure land use that may jeopardize <br /> the integrity of previously closed sites or pose a potential threat to public <br /> health and safety or the environment? 0 O/N <br /> If yes, briefly describe the proposed project: <br /> C Is there a postclosure land use tracking system? ("(/N)) <br /> If yes, describe tracking system: /tj <br /> V1. Disposal Site Priority (See Prioritization Chart) <br /> A 1: A 2:—A 3: B 1:—B 2:—B 3: C1: C2: *,"'C3: ...__ D: <br /> V11. Comments <br /> elcx- <br /> V' C <br /> ATE: <br /> PREPARED BY: <br /> COMPLIANCE BRANCH REVIEW: <br /> CIWMB CLOSURE AND REMEDIATION BRANCH APPROVAL: <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> ClWMB Closure and Remediation Branch(1/25/93) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.