Laserfiche WebLink
• I V. Surface Condition <br /> A. Is site access adequately restricted?CYjN) <br /> B. Is the waste adequately covered to prevent human contact? <br /> ++ C. IIss the finaAayl drainage system for the site adequate to prevent erosion? <br /> 11 J11 <br /> &�y "IOf F <br /> D. Is the final grading adequate to promote run-off? (Y/N) <br /> E. Are slopes greater than 3:1 (33% or 18 degrees)? <br /> F. Are slopes greater than 1.75:1 (57% or 30 degrees)? (Y/N) <br /> V. Postclosure Land Use <br /> A. Has the land use of the site significantly changed since closure? <br /> If es, include or reference site improvement plans and answer the following: <br /> y d . e � r.. .t( , <br /> 1. Give the date that the improvements were constructed — <br /> r-r IM <br /> 2. Have the improvements compromised the int e rity of the Tin—al <br /> cover? (Y/N/NA) <br /> 3. Has differential settlement affected the improvements? (Y N) mac_ <br /> B. Is there a proposed change in postclosure land use that may jeopardize <br /> the integrity of previously closed sites or p se a potential threat to public <br /> health and safety or the environment? /NAA> <br /> If yes, briefly describe the proposed project: <br /> C. Is there a postclosure land use tracking system? (YNR � <br /> If yes, describe tracking system: <br /> VI. Disposal Site Priority (See Prioritization Chart) <br /> A1: A2:—A 3: B1:—B 2: C1: C2:--!'C 3: D: <br /> , <br /> VII. Comments <br /> F a <br /> r <br /> e <br /> PREPARED BY: t , " DATE: .� <br /> 77, <br /> COMPLIANCE BRANCH REVIEW: <br /> CIWMB CLOSURE AND REMEDIATION BRANCH APPROVAL: <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> CIWMB Closure and Remediation Brandi(1/25/93) <br />