Laserfiche WebLink
ASEI@StUS For Removing A.C.M. <br />(Asbestos Containing Mater.alj <br />(THE ENCAPSULATING REMOVAL) <br />BATTELLE CONFIRMS THAT BWE 5000 REMOVAL ENCAPSULANT WETS <br />AND ENCAPSULATES BOTH CHRYSOTILE AND AMOSITE FIBERS <br />The Columbus Division of Battelle Laboratories recently conducted an independent <br />test of the wetting and encapsulating capabilities of the BWE 5000 removal <br />encapsulant manufactured by Better Working Environments, Inc. of Las Vegas, <br />Nevada. BWE's removal encapsulant is fast replacing amended water as the material <br />used to wet asbestos during removal operations. <br />Battelle, which has tested well over 100 traditional encapsulants, concluded that <br />BWE 5000 is "an outstanding material for wetting and encapusulation of asbestos <br />fibers." It is observed that BWE 5000 wet both chrysotfle and amosite fibers "almost <br />instantaneously" when . the fibers were placed in contact with the removal <br />encapsulant. BWE points to this ability to wet amosite as a significant technological <br />advance, for traditional anended water is known not to be effective on amosite. <br />Of equal importance is Battelle's conclusion that the BWE product actually coats <br />fibers onto which - it is sprayed: Once coated,-. it is highly likely that the fibers <br />will lose their aerodynamic properties. In other words, fibers coated with BWE <br />5000 connot remain airborne. BWE represntatives say this factor explains why <br />airborne asbestos fiber counts during removal with BWE 5000 are certain to be lower <br />than the counts obtained when' amended water is used. <br />The ability of BWE- ,. 5000 to. "wet, coat,, encapsulate and render asbestos fibers <br />incapable of remaining `- airborne 'makes it a superior product for meeting the <br />NESHAPS wet methods .requirements. <br />OSHA "POINTS TO" REMOVAL. ENCAPSULANT TECHNOLOGY IN <br />DECIDING THAT 0.2 F/CC PEL IS TECHNOLOGICALLY FEASIBLE . <br />a <br />The Department of, Labor's :Occupational Safety an Health Administration (OSHA)' <br />concluded an almost three year . long revision to its asbestos exposure regulations <br />by publishing, in' -the "June 20,' 1986 Federal Register, its final rules for general <br />industry and for the:: construction industry. The construction industry standard <br />applicable to asbestos abatement activities, sets a permissible exposure limit (PEL)` <br />of 0.2 fibers per : cubic centimeter : of down from the ; <br />° previous PEL of 2.0 f/,cc`s <br />The standard, effective January 17, 1987, also recognizes the use of asbestos. <br />removal encapsulants, an alternative to traditional amended water removal, as,, ani <br />acceptable work practice. <br />OSHA established the 0.2 f/cc PEL despite comments from industry representatives. <br />claiming that it was not technologically feasible for such a low standard to be met. <br />In reaching its conclusion on technological feasibility, OSHA specifically pointed <br />to the existence of the removal, encapsulant technique for . reducing asbestos dust <br />during abatement activity. ; Information on the removal encapsulant technology was <br />provided to OSHA's Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health by Better <br />Working Environments, Inc., the manufacturer of BWE 5000 removal encapsulant <br />and an asbestos penetrating encapsulant. Since the new 0.2 f/cc PEL became <br />effective,. the use of removal encapsulants such as BWE 5000 has been an effective <br />method in contractors' efforts to comply with the lower PEL. Studies have shown, <br />and OSHA has concluded, that it is very difficult to achieve the 0.2 level using <br />amended water, the wetting technique employed in the abatement industry in years <br />past. <br />ILI <br />D <br />El <br />71 <br />17 <br />