Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Robert McClellon <br />July 29, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />extraction wells was below 5 ppmv. Based on these results, VOC constituents could be present in <br />groundwater. To assess the presence or absence of VOC constituents in groundwater, three groundwater <br />monitoring wells were installed at the site on June 12, 2006. Following the installation of the <br />groundwater monitoring wells, groundwater samples were collected quarterly and analyzed for VOCs. <br />Mr. Ross Atkinson of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Central Valley Region <br />requested that groundwater samples be collected and analyzed for metals and general minerals (only total <br />dissolved solids [TDS] after the first event) starting in the fourth quarter of 2006. In a meeting on <br />May 24, 2007, Mr. Atkinson concurred with the recommendation in the Quarterly Monitoring Report <br />dated April 30, 2007, to suspend the groundwater monitoring activities for VOCs. <br />FIELD ACTIVITIES <br />Landfill gas concentrations were measured within the gas -migration monitoring probes, extraction wells, <br />and passive vents, and the quarterly groundwater monitoring activities were completed on June 8, 2010. <br />Using a handheld portable landfill gas monitor, a GEM 2000, each gas -migration monitoring probe, each <br />extraction well, and each passive vent was measured for methane, oxygen, and carbon dioxide. These <br />measurements were recorded in a field logbook. <br />Groundwater samples were collected from the three monitoring wells using the following procedures: <br />• The water level within each monitoring well was measured using an electronic water level sounder. <br />• Prior to groundwater sample collection, each well was purged using a bailer. During purging, <br />groundwater parameters (pH, temperature, and conductivity) were recorded on the Monitoring Well <br />Sampling Data form (Attachment 1) at least once per well casing volume. Purging was completed <br />when the groundwater parameters had stabilized to within 10 percent or the monitoring well was <br />bailed dry. The purged water was placed in a 55 -gallon drum, pending disposal. <br />• A groundwater sample, collected from each well using a bailer, was placed into the analytical <br />laboratory -prepared sample containers. <br />• Groundwater samples were labeled and placed in an ice chest with ice. The ice chest was shipped to <br />EMAX Laboratories, Inc. in Torrance, California, under proper chain -of -custody procedures for <br />selected dissolved metals analyses by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) <br />Method 6010/6020/7470 and TDS analysis by EPA Method 160.1. <br />RESULTS <br />Soil Vapor. The methane concentrations measured during the quarter in the gas -migration monitoring <br />probes were zero percent (%) in all probes and both vapor extraction wells. Methane concentrations <br />measured in the vapor extraction wells were 2.3% in EW -1 and 3.2% in EW -2. Methane concentrations <br />measured in the passive vents were 3.6% in VP -1, 4.9% in VP -2, 5.9% in VP -3, and 5.1% in VP -4. <br />Oxygen concentrations measured at all sample locations during the quarter ranged from 0% to 17.3%. <br />H:\Wprocess\25532\WorldEnterprise\Quarterly Rpt\20102Q 10\2Q 10_0729 I O.cbc <br />