My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1968-2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TURNPIKE
>
3504
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0515730
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1968-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:50:43 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:38:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1968-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0515730
PE
4430 - SOLID WASTE CIA SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0012310
FACILITY_NAME
WORLD ENTERPRISES
STREET_NUMBER
3504
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
TURNPIKE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17517018
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
SITE_LOCATION
S TURNPIKE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0515730_0 S TURNPIKE_1968-2006.tif
Site Address
3504 S TURNPIKE RD STOCKTON 95206
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I V. Surface Conditi <br />A. Is site access adequately restricted?,�,(�YN) <br />B. Is the waste adequately covered to prevent human contact? <br />ON) <br />C Is the ffina &ainage system for the site adequate to prevent erosion? <br />(Y6 <br />D. Is the final grading adequate to promote run-off? (Y�19) <br />E. Are slopes greater than 3:1 (33% or 18 degrees)? (9N) <br />F. Are slopes greater than 1.75:1 (57% or 30 degrees)? N) <br />V. Postclosure Land Use <br />A. Ha he land use of the site significantly changed since closure? <br />If yes, include or reference sitelimprovement plans and answer the following: <br />1. Give the date that the improvements were constructed <br />2. Have the improvements compromised the integrity of the final <br />cover? (Y/N/NA) u,L — <br />3. Has differential settlement affected the improvements? (Y/N) <br />B Is there a proposed change in postclosure land use that may jeopardize <br />the integrity of previously closed sites or;�se a potential threat to public <br />health and safety or the environment? (Y" <br />If yes, briefly describe the proposed project: <br />C. Is there a postclosure land use tracking system? (Y/N) <br />If yes, describe tracking system: <br />V1. <br />Disposal Site <br />Priority <br />(See <br />Prioritization, Chart) <br />A1: <br />A2:_A 3: <br />B1: <br />B2:_B <br />3: C1: C2:_C 3:—/D:— <br />Vill. Comments <br />PREPARED BY- <br />COMPLIANCE BRANCH REVIEW: <br />C1WMB CLOSURE AND REMEDIATION BRANCH APPROVAL: <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />ClWMB Closure and Remediation Branch (1/25193) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.