My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-1992
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 9:40:16 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1991-1992
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1991-1992.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
YUMM'.f y(pOEOMlLL'M <br /> ROY F. WESTON, INC. <br /> STOCKTON ANALYTICAL LABORATORY <br /> ANALYTICAL CASE NARRATIVE <br /> Client: PACIFIC ENERGY <br /> RFW#: 92065060 <br /> Test: 0602-PURGEABLE AROMATICS <br /> 1. This narrative covers the analysis of one (1) water sample in accordance with <br /> protocols based on EPA method 602. <br /> 2. The analytical holding time for this analysis was met. <br /> 3. Continuing calibration criteria was met for this analysis. <br /> 4. The method blanks associated with this sample did not contain any target analytes <br /> at, or above, the reporting limits. <br /> 5. Surrogate recoveries were within Laboratory QC limits. <br /> 6._, _ -Blank spike recoveries were within Laboratory QC limits. <br /> 7. Retention times were within QC tolerance limits. - <br /> 8. Confirmation by second column analysis was performed on the sample. <br /> 9. The analyte Chlorobenzene and 1,2-Dichlorobenzene seemed to be positive in this <br /> analysis but were reported as non-detected analytes due to the presence of interfering <br /> peaks. However, these analytes were detected above reporting limits and reported <br /> as positive hits in a 601 analysis performed at a lower dilution. <br /> 'Unit Leader <br /> Date <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.