Laserfiche WebLink
FI IT BY.Co merce 29-91 :3:St'PM ? ;# S <br /> 9r-IY I 'Q i I RV I I , 111661 1 V ill a nvi <br /> Table I (continued) <br /> Comparison of RegulatoryLimits to ]Plaut Condensate Results <br /> (INORGANICS) <br /> a 'a <br /> Fperjy <br /> Regulated Plant <br /> Constituent STLC TCLP Condensate <br /> (Mal) Cm <br /> I11ony 77 NEW. <br /> Arsenic 5.05.0 0.086 —° <br /> Asbestoi na I, I "® <br /> (as rcerit) <br /> Barium 100 100.0 NR — <br /> Beryllium 0.75 1q h/� ND ®ryeQ05 — <br /> 'um 1.0 .0 t 0.005 <br /> Chromium (VI) 5 5.0 NR <br /> Chromium (1II) 560 NU 0.010 <br /> Cobalt 80 6 : a 'f�'1NR <br /> �/� e� <br /> Copper <br /> 25 ,9M4'`','''?' N 61,025 rA° <br /> ` FluorideNR <br /> las 1j80 iR'1 .... ° + ~ <br /> Lead"' 5.0 5.® 0.004 — <br /> Mercury 0.2 0.2 ND 0.001 <br /> 5� aoi'ra l� ''::i <br /> Molybdenum1,„,;.r:.�,,is <br /> �� 4,r ND 0.040 <br /> Selenium <br /> �n NR <br /> 20 ��”� ,,, //���$,a D 0/�ry� — <br /> Selenium 1,0 „1.0 I" D 0.005 <br /> Silver 5 5.0 0.010 <br /> Thaillum7A "� IND 0 0X0 <br /> Vanadium 24 a�f , NR <br /> Zinc 250 — <br /> Notes <br /> 1. The Laboratory Case Narrative states,that a dilution, was <br /> required due to the presence of background matrix peaks. The <br /> surrogate recovery was below advisory limits. <br /> 2. The Laboratory Case Narrative states that the presence of <br /> 2,4—D could not be confirmed an a second colu=because of <br /> Interfering peaks, <br />