My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigations <br /> F. Vegetation and Wildlife <br /> mitigation through contribution of funds to the development and preservation of a large <br /> area(s)providing foraging and breeding habitat for this species. Such a plan is preferrable, <br /> in that it provides a fair and consistent approach in achieving mitigation for such <br /> displacements and provides for effective management of this species on a regional level. <br /> This impact would be reduced to a less-than-significant level if Mitigation Measure F.3(b)is <br /> implemented,or if F.3(c)is implemented and plan participation meets the mitigation <br /> requirements of the CDFG. <br /> Impact FA. Implementation of the r ' <br /> p p proposed protect may result an the loss of a Swainson's <br /> hawk breeding territory and disturbance of nesting Swainson's hawks. (SIGNIFICANT) <br /> During ESA's biological field investigations,a nesting pair of Swainson's hawks was observed in <br /> a valley oak on the eastern boundary of the Brocchini property on April 4, 1991 (see <br /> Figure III.F.1). During subsequent field work,no additional nesting of this species was <br /> observed,although a total of thirteen potential raptor nests were identified in on-site trees (see <br /> Figure III.F.1). Additionally, Swainson's hawks were observed foraging over the Brocchini <br /> property and adjacent lands to the east on April 4, 1991,July 2, 1992,and March 19, 1993. <br /> Nesting on the site by this species during the 1993 breeding season has not been determined. <br /> Under current CDFG guidelines,disturbance within 1/2 mile of an active nest site may result in <br /> nest abandonment or forced fledging, and is therefore considered a significant impact(CDFG, <br /> 1992). This impact would also be considered significant under CEQA, as it would "substantially <br /> affect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant or the habitat of the species." <br /> Although the potential nest trees would not be directly impacted by landfill expansion with <br /> implementation of Mitigation Measure F.2(c),construction and operational activities associated <br /> with the proposed project may result in the hawk's abandonment of any on-site nest due to noise <br /> disturbances,placement of human activity in proximity to nest sites, and elimination of foraging <br /> habitat adjacent to these sites. Impacts which would result in such disturbance would be <br /> considered a"take" of this threatened species and would be a violation of CEQA and Sections <br /> 3503,3503.5, and 3800 of the California Fish and Game Code. Although no mitigation is <br /> available that would assure continued nesting on the site after project implementation,mitigation <br /> is focused on avoiding impacts to nesting individuals,retention of potential nest trees, <br /> establishment of additional potential nest trees,and compensating for loss of breeding habitat <br /> through proximate site enhancement and preservation as explained above under Impact F.3. <br /> HI.F.28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.