Laserfiche WebLink
III. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigations <br /> g P g <br /> G. Air Quality <br /> (b) Design and implement a landfill gas recovery system to ensure efficient destruction of <br /> odoriferous substances, and to ensure that there are no major odor leaks to the atmosphere. <br /> (c) Ensure that loading,unloading,and material handling activities are carried out efficiently <br /> and without delays to avoid excessive odors. <br /> (d) Apply daily cover over odorous materials as soon as possible. <br /> Implementation of the mitigation measures described above would reduce this impact to a less- <br /> than-significant level. <br /> Off-Site Impacts <br /> Impact G.6. The project,by extending the time the current number of vehicles trips travel <br /> to and from the site,would result in an increase in criteria air pollutant emissions. <br /> (ADVERSE) <br /> The project would result in about 220 vehicle daily trip ends. Table III.G.2 includes an estimate <br /> of project-generated criteria air pollutants from motor vehicle emissions,including a comparison <br /> with projected county-wide emission totals. The peak-hour traffic volume would be about 30 <br /> trips during the morning. Most of these trips would be trucks, with a few employee trips. While <br /> cars are major sources of CO emissions,trucks generally emit NOx and HC,but not substantial <br /> quantities of CO. As shown in Table III.G.2, vehicular emissions would be relatively minimal <br /> when compared with regional County-wide emission totals. Traffic would not increase <br /> substantially should soil import be required and thus,this would not increase vehicular emissions <br /> substantially. <br /> CO concentrations build up at crowded/congested intersections and heavily travelled roadways, <br /> and depending on the traffic volume,cause the violation of ambient CO standards. The relatively <br /> low number of project-generated peak-hour vehicles(30 trips/hour)would not be sufficient to <br /> generate substantial amounts of CO on their own. Given that the access roads are not heavily <br /> travelled (63 trips/hour at a speed of 35 mph or more),and that trucks(which constitute the <br /> majority of peak-hour vehicles) are not considered major emitters of CO,the project would not <br /> have a significant effect on ambient CO concentrations. <br /> If the landfill were not to continue to accept wastes,then the waste would have to be hauled to <br /> other landfills,which could result in a net increase in total vehicle-miles travelled. Depending on <br /> the relative change in.total vehicle miles travelled by haul trips,the project would add or reduce <br /> III.G.17 <br />