My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IV. IMPACT OVERVIEW <br /> A. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS <br /> CEQA requires consideration in an EIR of potential environmental impacts which are <br /> individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The cumulative impacts analyses in this <br /> document are made on the basis of list-based past,present and reasonably anticipated future <br /> projects. On occasion(for example,in the Transportation analysis),other projected growth rates <br /> are used to encompass both specific development projects and other regional growth. The only <br /> proposed project in the area is the Forward,Inc.Landfill Use Permit Modification,as described <br /> in Chapter I,Introduction. San Joaquin County has indicated that no other projects of any kind <br /> are planned within the project vicinity(Martin, 1993). <br /> The cumulative effects of the project together with other reasonably foreseeable development has <br /> been considered in each of the various analyses of Chapter III. Please see these analyses for <br /> detail concerning the potential for impacts in each topic area. In summary,the following <br /> significant cumulative impacts were identified: <br /> • the proposed project would contribute cumulatively to the significant disruption of the <br /> ■ physical arrangement of the surrounding community; <br /> • cumulative air pollutant emissions that would contribute significantly to air pollutant <br /> emissions,dust, and odor problems; <br /> • project-related noise would contribute to a cumulative increase in ambient noise levels; <br /> • potential seepage of leachate from the landfill expansion and Forward,Inc.Landfill to <br /> cumulatively affect water quality if not properly mitigated;and <br /> • the project,by incrementally adding to local landfill gas generation(Austin Road and <br /> Forward,Inc.Landfill),would have a cumulative public health impact. <br /> After mitigation,the remaining unavoidable significant cumulative impact includes: <br /> • the proposed project would contribute cumulatively to the significant disruption of the <br /> physicalarrangement of the surrounding community. <br /> IV.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.