Laserfiche WebLink
V. Alternatives to the Project <br /> this case,the environmentally superior alternative would be the Current-Footprint-with- <br /> Increased-Elevation-and-Creek-Realignment-South Alternative. <br /> The analysis of each identified alternative is presented below. <br /> A. NO-PROTECT ALTERNATIVE <br /> DESCRIPTION <br /> This alternative assumes that the Austin Road Landfill would not be expanded horizontally and <br /> vertically and Little Johns Creek would not be relocated to the north and west. Solid waste <br /> would continue to be disposed of at Austin Road Landfill until current capacity is reached. The <br /> 45 acres south of Little Johns Creek would be filled since it is part of the permitted landfill. The <br /> maximum fill height would be 90 feet MSL. To maximize filling capacity within the permitted <br /> landfill,support facilities would be located outside of the fill area. Under this alternative,the <br /> landfill would have a remaining refuse capacity of 3.4 million cubic yards and close in 2007. <br /> Because the creek would not be realigned,project-related impacts to biology and hydrology <br /> would not occur. However,this alternative would create a landfill divided by an unlined portion <br /> of Little Johns Creek. The California Youth Authority(CYA)parcel to the north would be <br /> needed as a borrow source for cover material and could accommodate recycling,tire handling, <br /> and temporary hazardous materials storage,and administrative facilities. The No-Project <br /> Alternative would leave the Brocchini parcel open to continued agriculture or for additional <br /> future development. As with the project,it is assumed that post-closure use of the site would be <br /> public lands,inaccessible to the public. <br /> Total truck miles traveled without the project would probably be more than with theJro'ect <br /> P <br /> because the waste would probably be hauled longer distances for disposal. The current need to <br /> establish landfill capacity for waste generated in the City of Stockton would be directed to other <br /> existing County landfills or to waste-diversion programs. The ability of other landfills to manage <br /> the waste is discussed below. <br /> Foothill Landfill. Foothill Landfill,a Class III landfill,is located in east San Joaquin County,off <br /> Waverly Road, 10 miles east of the town of Linden and approximately 25 miles east of the City <br /> of Stockton. The eastern boundary is the San Joaquin/Stanislaus County line. The landfill, <br /> overseen by the County,receives approximately 2,000 tons a week,with most of it coming from <br /> the Lovelace Transfer Station(San Joaquin County, 1986 and 1988). The County plans to <br /> replace the Lovelace Transfer Station with a materials recovery facility(Horton, 1993). The <br /> V.2 <br />