My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. .. i <br /> 2. Revegetation of historical nesting habitat with suitable native <br /> nest trees species (e.g., oaks, cottonwoods, sycamores, etc.) <br /> adjacent to adequate forage habitat shall.be undertaken. Sites <br /> at least five acres in size are recommended. <br /> C. Maintenance of sufficient foraging habitat to support breedinct <br /> pairs and successful fledgiM of youuig. <br /> 1. Impact avoidance and project alternatives must be thoroughly <br /> analyzed and discussed with DFG representatives prior to <br /> adverse modification of foraging habitat as required by CEQA <br /> (Section 21002; Guidelines sec. 15002, 15021, 15126, 21100) . <br /> This discussion must focus on alternatives capable of either <br /> eliminating any significant adverse environmental effect or <br /> reducing them to a level less than significant, even if such <br /> alternatives would be more costly or to some degree impede the <br /> project's objectives. <br /> 2. Potential foraging areas are described as identified foraging <br /> habitat types located within a 10-mile radius from an active <br /> Swainson's hawk nesting territory. Any adverse modification of <br /> these foraging areas may require mitigation for loss of <br /> foraging habitat. The criteria for assessing this mitigation <br /> is as follows: <br /> a. Territory must have been used at least once historically <br /> (as determined by Dm Swainson's hawk nesting records or <br /> other confirmed sources) . <br /> b. Mitigation will be required for all lands within the <br /> defined foraging area (10 miles) , excluding the following: <br /> Lands which are currently in urban use or lands that have <br /> no existing or potential value for foraging Swainson's <br /> hawks as determined by site specific surveys by a DFG <br /> approved raptor biologist. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.