COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Austin Road Landfill E*ion Project EIR Comments and Responses EffLpom to San To Wn CMIX Solid Waste Division Comments Response to Comment 1: The following is added to the end of Mitigation B.3 in both text and summary sections to assure that project lighting does not adversely affect operations at the Stockton Airport: (e) The Stockton Airport management shall be provided with project lighting plans for review and comment. Modifications to the lighting plan shall be made as necessary to avoid conflicts with airport operations." Response to Comment 2s Mitigation(a)for Impact L.2 has been revised to read as follows(SEIR p31): 4`17.le ' landfill operator would continue the City of Stockton's load checking program to discourage the improper disposal of hazardous materials." Response to Comment 3: Comment noted. The use of a qualified biologist to monitor the proposed biological mitigation measures is incorporated into the project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Response to Comment 4: See Response to Comment 2,above. Response to Comment 5: The first sentence of the first paragraph under"County of San Joaquin"on p. 51 of the WEIR is corrected as follows: "After the landfill reverts to County jurisdiction,the n Local Enforcement Agency(San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division) would assume responsibility for the local regulatory and monitoring functions now fulfilled by the City of Stockton." Response to Comment 6: The traffic generation rates used in the DSEIR include estimates of all haulers (licensed haulers and self-haulers)projected to use the expanded landfill. Response to Comment 7: The referenced programs are proposed for continuation under County jurisdiction. They are identified in the mitigation measures,for example provision of bottled water is included in Mitigation K.10. (see DSEIR p.30). The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program would be the vehicle for assuring continuation of these programs. ~ 62