My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2021 8:55:58 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1996-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sfrench
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1996-2003.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
623
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. R5-2003-0049 -20- <br /> FORWARD INC. AND ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES <br /> FOR OPERATION OF <br /> FORWARD CLASS H LANDFILL <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 10. The methods of analysis and the detection limits used must be appropriate for the <br /> expected concentrations. For the monitoring of any constituent or parameter that is found <br /> in concentrations which produce more than 90%non-numerical determinations (i.e., <br /> "trace"or"ND") in data from background monitoring points for that medium, the <br /> analytical method having the lowest method detection limit(MDL) shall be selected from <br /> among those methods which would provide valid results in light of any matrix effects or <br /> interferences. <br /> 11. "Trace" results -results falling between the MDL and the practical quantitation limit <br /> (PQL) - shall be reported as such, and shall be accompanied both by the estimated MDL <br /> and PQL values for that analytical run. <br /> 12. MDLs and PQLs shall be derived by the laboratory for each analytical procedure, <br /> according to State of California laboratory accreditation procedures. These MDLs and <br /> PQLs shall reflect the detection and quantitation capabilities of the specific analytical <br /> procedure and equipment used by the lab, rather than simply being quoted from USEPA <br /> analytical method manuals. In relatively interference-free water, laboratory-derived <br /> MDLs and PQLs are expected to closely agree with published USEPA MDLs and PQLs. <br /> 13. If the laboratory suspects that, due to a change in matrix or other effects,the true <br /> detection limit or quantitation limit for a particular analytical run differs significantly <br /> from the laboratory-derived MDL/PQL values, the results shall be flagged accordingly, <br /> along with estimates of the detection limit and quantitation limit actually achieved. The <br /> MDL shall always be calculated such that it represents the lowest achievable <br /> concentration associated with a 99% reliability of a nonzero result. The PQL shall <br /> always be calculated such that it represents the lowest constituent concentration at which <br /> a numerical value can be assigned with reasonable certainty that it represents the <br /> constituent's actual concentration in the sample. Normally, PQLs should be set equal to <br /> the concentration of the lowest standard used to calibrate the analytical procedure. <br /> 14. All QA/QC data shall be reported, along with the sample results to which they apply, <br /> including the method, equipment, analytical detection and quantitation limits, the percent <br /> recovery, an explanation for any recovery that falls outside the QC limits, the results of <br /> equipment and method blanks, the results of spiked and surrogate samples, the frequency <br /> of quality control analysis, and the name and qualifications of the person(s)performing <br /> the analyses. Sample results shall be reported unadjusted for blank results or spike <br /> recoveries. In cases where contaminants are detected in QA/QC samples (i.e., field, trip, <br /> or lab blanks), the accompanying sample results shall be appropriately flagged. <br /> 15. Unknown chromatographic peaks shall be reported, along with an estimate of the <br /> concentration of the unknown analyte. When unknown peaks are encountered, second <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.