Laserfiche WebLink
KLEINFELDER <br /> General Minerals <br /> The general mineral analysis of the ground water samples collected is presented in Table <br /> 4-7. The inorganic ground water quality is good, and agrees with the assessment of the <br /> water quality by USGS (Section 1.3.2). <br /> Water chemistry analyses and Stiff diagrams are included in Appendix D. The ground <br /> water type varies slightly from season to season. In July 1989, MW-1 was a sodium- <br /> magnesium/bicarbonate water, while MW-2 and LW-1 were calcium- <br /> magnesium/bicarbonate waters. In October 1989, MW-1 was a calcium- <br /> magnesium/bicarbonate water and MW-2 and LW-1 were calcium/bicarbonate waters. In <br /> January 1990 and April 1990 all three waters were calcium/bicarbonaate waters. <br /> 4.5 SURFACE WATER <br /> Surface water samples were collected and submitted for analysis of constituents and <br /> parameters listed in the SWWQAT Proposal. Additionally, samples were collected at the <br /> landfill perimeter on two dates for analysis of the constituents and parameters in <br /> monitoring and Reporting Program 89-018. The results are summarized in Table 4-8. <br /> Chain-of-custody forms and a copy of the certified analytical report form Enseco, Inc. West <br /> Sacramento, are included in Appendix D. <br /> The water quality of the surface water runoff samples collected from the east side of the <br /> landfill, SW-7 through SW-10, appear to be slightly different from expected natural water <br /> quality of surface waters in the United States'O. 'IDS concentrations were higher and the <br /> concentrations of the major ions were higher in SW-8 and SW-9.Iron was elevated in SW-7 <br /> and SW-10. According to the USGS, iron concentrations in surface water are generally <br /> around 1 mg/L. Iron concentrations in both surface water flows at the landfill perimeter _ <br /> are greater than this,with iron in SW-10 (14.7 mg/1)being much greater than this. <br /> The Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in SW-9 (70.1 mg/1) and SW-10 (3.3 mg/1) are <br /> • significantly different from the TOC observed in the other surface water runoff samples, <br /> which ranges from 19.5 to 33.5 mg/1. This may indicate that one or both of the surface <br /> water samples is affected, or it may be a result of natural variability in this constituent. <br /> FOOTHILL 29 <br />