Laserfiche WebLink
Results <br /> Groundwater: The groundwater samples from the temporary borings were found free of <br /> contaminants (Appendix A). These results are consistent with data collected <br /> from MW-3 since January 2002. <br /> Soil Gas: Among the many VOC compounds detected in the LFG, four VOC compounds <br /> were also detected in the soil gas collected near MW-3. However, these <br /> compounds are not detected in the water samples taken at MW-3 or at the <br /> temporary borings of this Evaluation Monitoring. <br /> Additionally,the two VOCs (1, 1-Dichloroethene, and Trichloroethene)which <br /> initially indicated impact to the groundwater were not detected in either the soil <br /> gas or the landfill gas sample. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> The results of the EMP reveal that groundwater is not impacted by the presence of the Foothill <br /> Landfill at this time. Corrective action is,therefore,not warranted. No further investigation is <br /> proposed at this time. <br /> Monitoring of the groundwater will continue in accordance with Detection Monitoring. <br /> Thep resence of VOCs in soil gas apparently does not cause impact to groundwater, at least at <br /> the concentrations measured in the soil in these tests. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The detection of VOCs at MW-3 from March 2000 to October 2001, and the lack of verified <br /> detections since that time indicate a transient effect. In an attempt to identify the mechanism of <br /> this transient effect, Solid Waste staff interviewed the site operator and past Solid Waste staff. <br /> This investigation indicates that an area(approximately 40'x 60') over refuse fill, immediately <br /> adjacent to MW-3, experienced ponding in the winters of 1995-1998. The slope of this area was <br /> corrected, and future ponding prevented,by regrading this area in the spring of 1998. <br /> It is probable that the cause of the detections at MW-3 was the result an increase in LFG <br /> production in those portions of the refuse to which moisture intruded. This increase in LFG <br /> production would increase the movement of LFG through the soil, and with it the potential <br /> transport of VOCs. It is speculated that this increased transport was sufficient to cause impact to <br /> ' be detected at MW-1 while it was occurring. <br /> Once the ponding was corrected in 1998,the LFG production in the wetted refuse subsided and <br /> the impact gradually dissipated to the"non-detect" status indicated today. The dissipation of the <br /> Engineering Feasibility Report 3 Foothill Sanitary Landfill <br /> October 1,2003 San Joaquin County Solid Waste <br />