Laserfiche WebLink
stability of the slope lining system, the anchor trench is required only to support its own weight. The <br /> anchor trench for the side slope lining system was therefore designed to resist self-weight (dead) <br /> loads only. <br /> 3.1 Seismic Hazard Analysis <br /> Because the Forward Landfill is located in a seismically active area, stability analyses for final grade <br /> conditions must consider seismically induced forces on the refuse fill and slope. The Title 27 <br /> regulations require that landfills that accept designated waste be designed to withstand the maximum <br /> credible earthquake(MCE). <br /> The Forward Landfill, which is located in the Central Valley of California, has a history of low seismic <br /> activity. It is not located in an area of rapid geologic change. The surface projection of the Tracy- <br /> Stockton Fault Zone passes through the City of Stockton, 6.5 miles northwest of the site. This fault zone <br /> is the closest known to the landfill site and does not show evidence of Holocene displacement.No special <br /> containment structures are therefore needed for the landfill to preclude failure due to such events. <br /> A seismic hazard analysis (GeoSyntee, 2001) was performed for the Forward Landfill on the basis of <br /> information provided in recent relevant studies of known active and potentially active faults and <br /> earthquake zones in California. Significant active and potentially active faults and seismic source <br /> zones within 100 miles (160 km)of the project site are listed in the analysis. Also listed are the strong <br /> ground shaking duration (DS) and Peak Horizontal Ground Acceleration (PHGA) estimates for the <br /> MPE and MCE. Both estimates are for a hypothetical bedrock outcrop at the geometric center of the <br /> Forward landfill site. The seismic hazard analysis indicates that the M,y 6.4 MPE event on the Great <br /> Valley blind thrust system at a distance of 21mi (34 km) induces the highest bedrock MPE PHGA at <br /> the site. The analysis further indicates that the M,,, 6.7 MCE event on the Great Valley blind thrust <br /> system at a distance of 21 miles (34 km) induces the highest bedrock MCE PHGA at the site. <br /> The MPE and MCE on the San Andreas fault system are characterized by the same M,u 7.9 event at a <br /> distance of 70 miles (112 km). This large-magnitude distant event induces the longest duration of <br /> strong ground shaking at the site. Given a relatively small difference in the estimated bedrock PHGA <br /> and the relatively large difference in estimated Ds, the M,,,7.9 event on the San Andreas fault system <br /> may be the most damaging earthquake for the Forward Landfill. Therefore, the M,,,7.9 event on the <br /> San Andreas fault system should be considered for evaluation of both MPE and MCE design ground <br /> motions at the Forward Landfill along with the appropriate MW event on the Great Valley blind thrust <br /> system. <br /> A target acceleration response spectral envelope was developed for each of the MCE/MPE candidate <br /> events using the median and 84`h percentile acceleration response spectra evaluated using the <br /> Abrahamson and Silva [1997] attenuation model. Based upon the target significant duration of strong <br /> ground shaking and acceleration response spectral envelope for each candidate event, the following <br /> four time histories were selected to represent ground motions at hypothetical bedrock outcrop at the <br /> site: <br /> • the 270-degree component of the Saratoga-Aloha Avenue record from the M,u 6.9 Loma Prieta <br /> earthquake, scaled to either 0.19 g to represent the MCE or to 0.13 g to represent the MPE; <br /> • the 315-degree component of the Santa Teresa Hills record from the M,,, 6.9 Loma Prieta <br /> earthquake, scaled to either 0.19 g to represent the MCE or to 0.13 g to represent the MPE; <br /> FU-04 REPORTDOC 3-2 <br />