My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2004
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:21 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:42:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2004
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440004_6484 N WAVERLY_2004.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
574
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATIC AND SEISMIC STABILITY ANALYSIS <br /> Is WMU FU-04,FORWARD LANDFILL <br /> PROBLEM: <br /> Assess the static and seismic stability of the refuse over the base and side slope lining system for WMU <br /> FU-04 at the Forward,Inc. Landfill. <br /> GIVEN: <br /> These calculations have been previously performed for the prior WMUs at the site and they have been <br /> found to have a satisfactory factor of safety and seismic deformation. The analysis for WMU FU-04 is <br /> similar to WMU FU-03,WMU ART-03, and various other WMUs at the site. <br /> SUMMARY: <br /> 1. According to the site development and final grading plans for the site,the maximum planned elevation <br /> of refuse for the landfill is 170 ft MSL with 3:1 slopes and 20 ft wide benches every 50 vertical feet. <br /> The 170 ft elevation may only be achieved if waste placement occurs in adjacent waste management <br /> units. <br /> 2. The maximum elevation of refuse in WMU FU-04,prior to the development of adjacent waste <br /> management units, is 150 ft MSL.This elevation is based on 3:1 slopes on the south, east and west. <br /> The north slope is filled against an existing refuse slope. <br /> 3. Development is planned to the east of WMU FU-04. The east-facing slope of WMU FU-03 is <br /> therefore temporary. Waste placement in the adjacent cell to be constructed to the east of WMU FU- <br /> 04 will buttress the east facing WMU FU-04 slope. <br /> STABILITY ANALYSIS SECTIONS AND CRITERIA: <br /> 1. The critical cross section for the stability analysis is under the maximum filling configuration(refuse <br /> fill elevation 170 ft)in the N-S direction. <br /> 2. The acceptable static factor of safety is 1.5 for permanent slopes. For interim slopes, a static factor of <br /> safety of 1.2 to 1.3 is acceptable. <br /> 3. For seismic analyses, acceptable deformations are less than 1-foot. <br /> SUMMARY OF STABILITY ANALYSIS RESULTS <br /> I. The minimum factor of safety under the Forward Landfill maximum fill configuration(refuse elev. <br /> 170 ft)is 1.8. The critical failure surface extends from approximately the crest of refuse, through the <br /> refuse mass,and then along the base and slope liner. Both the base liner interfaces(clay/HDPE and <br /> cushion geotextile/HDPE)were analyzed but the clay/HDPE condition was found to be more critical. <br /> Failure surfaces extending along the base liner and through the interface liner slope were also searched <br /> but found to be less critical. From the seismic analysis, the anticipated amount of deformation is less <br /> than I-inch. <br /> 2. The minimum factor of safety under the central WMU FU-04 maximum fill configuration(refuse elev. <br /> 150 ft)is 1.7. The critical failure surface extends from approximately the crest of refuse,through the <br /> refuse mass, and then along the base liner. Both the base liner interfaces(clay/HDPE and cushion <br /> geotextile/HDPE)were analyzed but the clay/HDPE condition was found to be more critical. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.